Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One
; 16(10): e0259110, 2021.
Article
de En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34679124
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https//osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes.
Texte intégral:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Base de données:
MEDLINE
Sujet principal:
Théorie éthique
/
Pandémies
/
SARS-CoV-2
/
COVID-19
/
Jugement
/
Sens moral
Limites:
Aged
/
Humans
/
Male
Langue:
En
Journal:
PLoS One
Sujet du journal:
CIENCIA
/
MEDICINA
Année:
2021
Type de document:
Article
Pays d'affiliation:
États-Unis d'Amérique