Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Tian, Xu; Yi, Li-Juan; Han, Yang; Chen, Hui; Liu, Xiao-Ling; Chen, Wei-Qing; Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F.
Affiliation
  • Tian X; Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
  • Yi LJ; Department of Nursing, Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Zhuzhou, China.
  • Han Y; Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen H; Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Liu XL; Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen WQ; Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Jiménez-Herrera MF; Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(10): e19915, 2021 10 25.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34694227
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Various enhanced patient instructions (EPIs) have been used for bowel preparation (BP) and our previous meta-analysis also demonstrated the efficacy of EPIs in increasing the colonic polyp and adenoma detection rates; however, the optimal method for adequate BP has not yet been developed.

OBJECTIVE:

We performed a network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions.

METHODS:

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of EPIs with each other or standard patient instructions (SPIs) for BP. We performed direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses for all instructions and used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria to appraise the quality of evidence.

RESULTS:

We included 23 RCTs (7969 patients) comparing 10 different instructions. In direct meta-analyses, most of the EPIs, except visual aids and mobile apps, increased the adequate preparation rate (APR). Network meta-analyses showed that additional explanations were superior to visual aids (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.59), telephone calls (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.37-0.99), educational videos (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.5-0.77), and mobile apps (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.68) with low-to-high-quality evidence; newly designed booklets (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.59-6.16), SMS text messaging (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.28-3.91), telephone calls (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-1.78), educational videos (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.40-3.65), and social media applications (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.4-3.93) were superior to visual aids and mobile apps with low-to-high-quality evidence. SMS text messaging, telephone calls, and social media applications increase adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime. Social media applications reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs). Telephone calls and social media applications increase the polyp detection rate (PDR).

CONCLUSIONS:

Newly designed booklets, telephone calls, educational videos, and social media applications can improve the quality of BP. Telephone calls and social media applications improve adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime, reduce the risk of AEs, and increase the PDR. TRIAL REGISTRATION INPLASY (International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols) INPLASY2020120103; https//inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-12-0103/.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Envoi de messages textuels / Applications mobiles Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Med Internet Res Sujet du journal: INFORMATICA MEDICA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Espagne

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Envoi de messages textuels / Applications mobiles Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Med Internet Res Sujet du journal: INFORMATICA MEDICA Année: 2021 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Espagne
...