Multicentric comparative analysis of Retzius versus Retzius sparing robotic assisted simple prostatectomy in the management of large prostate glands.

ABSTRACT

AIM: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is a minimally invasive alternative to open simple prostatectomy in the management of patients with large prostate glands suffering from moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Our study aimed to evaluate two transvesical robotic approaches in order to compare functional outcomes and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data from 111 consecutive patients from three tertiary robotic centers were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the surgical approach: 58 Retzius sparing and 53 Retzius approach RASP. We evaluated peri-operative outcomes (operating time, blood loss, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay), as well as intra-operative and early complications using a Clavien Dindo scale. Fisher's exact test, chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were applied for statistical analyses. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Neither subgroup differed significantly in age (p = 0.104), Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.088) or prostate volume (p = 0.507), total IPSS score (0.763) and Qmax (p = 0.651). Total complication rates were lower for the Retzius approach subgroup (19 vs 11.9%) without reaching statistical significance in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.17 - 8.44, p = 0.84). No significant differences based on IPSS total score and Qmax could be observed between the two subgroups during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both RASP approaches provide similar results in terms of functional outcomes and present a good safety profile in the management of large prostatic adenomas. Larger trials are needed in order to establish the indications for each robotic technique.