Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region: development and mixed-methods validation in six countries.
Valente, Emanuelle Pessa; Covi, Benedetta; Mariani, Ilaria; Morano, Sandra; Otalea, Marina; Nanu, Ioana; Nanu, Micaela Iuliana; Elden, Helen; Linden, Karolina; Zaigham, Mehreen; Vik, Eline Skirnisdottir; Kongslien, Sigrun; Nedberg, Ingvild; Costa, Raquel; Rodrigues, Carina; Dias, Heloísa; Drandic, Daniela; Kurbanovic, Magdalena; Sacks, Emma; Muzigaba, Moise; Lincetto, Ornella; Lazzerini, Marzia.
Affiliation
  • Valente EP; WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy emanuelle.pessavalente@burlo.trieste.it.
  • Covi B; WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
  • Mariani I; WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
  • Morano S; Medical School and Midwifery School, Genoa University, Genoa, Italy.
  • Otalea M; University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Nanu I; SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Nanu MI; National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alessandrescu - Rusescu", Bucharest, Romania.
  • Elden H; National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alessandrescu - Rusescu", Bucharest, Romania.
  • Linden K; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Zaigham M; Region Västra Götaland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Vik ES; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Kongslien S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Nedberg I; Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
  • Costa R; Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Rodrigues C; Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Dias H; EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Drandic D; Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.
  • Kurbanovic M; Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Universidade Lusófona, Porto, Portugal.
  • Sacks E; EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Muzigaba M; Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.
  • Lincetto O; Regional Health Administration of the Algarve, IP (ARS - Algarve), Albufeira, Portugal.
  • Lazzerini M; Roda - Parents in Action, Zagreb, Croatia.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e056753, 2022 04 08.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35396296
OBJECTIVES: Develop and validate a WHO Standards-based online questionnaire to measure the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth from the health workers' perspective. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study. SETTING: Six countries of the WHO European Region. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The questionnaire is based on lessons learnt in previous studies, and was developed in three sequential phases: (1) WHO Quality Measures were prioritised and content, construct and face validity were assessed through a Delphi involving a multidisciplinary board of experts from 11 countries of the WHO European Region; (2) translation/back translation of the English version was conducted following The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines; (3) internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability were assessed among 600 health workers in six countries. RESULTS: The questionnaire included 40 items based on WHO Standards Quality Measures, equally divided into four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, organisational changes due to COVID-19; and its organised in six sections. It was translated/back translated in 12 languages: Bosnian, Croatian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. The Cronbach's alpha values were ≥0.70 for each questionnaire section where questions were hypothesised to be interrelated, indicating good internal consistence. Cohen K or Gwet's AC1 values were ≥0.60, suggesting good intrarater reliability, except for one question. Acceptability was good with only 1.70% of health workers requesting minimal changes in question wording. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the questionnaire has good content, construct, face validity, internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability in six countries of the WHO European Region. Future studies may further explore the questionnaire's use in other countries, and how to translate evidence generated by this tool into policies to improve the QMNC. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04847336.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: COVID-19 Type d'étude: Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Langue: En Journal: BMJ Open Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Italie Pays de publication: Royaume-Uni

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: COVID-19 Type d'étude: Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Langue: En Journal: BMJ Open Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Italie Pays de publication: Royaume-Uni