Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Benefits of Early Concurrent Use of Cryoprecipitate and Plasma Compared With Plasma Only in Bleeding Trauma Patients.
Endo, Akira; Senda, Atsushi; Otomo, Yasuhiro; Firek, Matthew; Kojima, Mitsuaki; Coimbra, Raul.
Affiliation
  • Endo A; Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Senda A; Department of Acute Critical Care Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Otsuno, Tsuchiura, Japan.
  • Otomo Y; Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Firek M; Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kojima M; Riverside University Health System-Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Moreno Valley, CA.
  • Coimbra R; Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Crit Care Med ; 50(10): 1477-1485, 2022 10 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35759689
OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of cryoprecipitate (Cryo) in trauma has not been well established; the benefits of Cryo might have been overestimated in previous studies since the difference in the total amount of administered clotting factors was not considered. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of the concurrent use of Cryo in combination with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for bleeding trauma patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2019. PATIENTS: Patients who received greater than or equal to 5 units of packed RBCs and at least 1 unit of FFP within the first 4 hours after arrival to a hospital were included and dichotomized according to whether Cryo was used within the first 4 hours of hospital arrival. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The outcomes of patients treated with Cryo and FFP were compared with those treated with FFP only using propensity score-matching analysis. The dose of administered clotting factors in each group was balanced. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence rate of adverse events. A total of 24,002 patients (Cryo+FFP group: 6,018; FFP only group: 17,984) were eligible for analysis, of whom 4,852 propensity score-matched pairs were generated. Significantly lower inhospital mortality (1,959 patients [40.4%] in the Cryo+FFP group vs 2,142 patients [44.1%] in the FFP only group; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93) was observed in the Cryo+FFP group; no significant difference was observed in the occurrence rate of adverse events (1,857 [38.3%] vs 1,875 [38.6%]; OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10). Several sensitivity analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Cryo use combined with FFP was significantly associated with reduced mortality in bleeding trauma patients. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Plasma sanguin / Hémorragie Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Crit Care Med Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Japon Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Plasma sanguin / Hémorragie Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Crit Care Med Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Japon Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique