Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the United States.
Borse, Rebekah H; Ramakrishnan, Karthik; Gandhi, Jyotika; Dhankhar, Praveen; Chirovsky, Diana.
Affiliation
  • Borse RH; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
  • Ramakrishnan K; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
  • Gandhi J; CHEORS, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Dhankhar P; CHEORS, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Chirovsky D; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
J Med Econ ; 25(1): 954-965, 2022.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765888
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Pembrolizumab, as monotherapy in first-line recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 and in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the overall R/M HNSCC population, received US FDA approval based on the KEYNOTE-048 trial. Using public drug prices, from a US payer perspective, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of each pembrolizumab regimen vs. cetuximab + platinum+5-FU (EXTREME regimen, trial comparator), cisplatin + docetaxel + cetuximab (TPEx regimen), cisplatin + paclitaxel, and platinum+5-FU.

METHODS:

A three-state partitioned-survival model was used to project costs and outcomes over 20 years with 3% annual discounting. Progression-free and overall survival were modeled using long-term extrapolation of KEYNOTE-048 data and, for alternative comparators, data from a network meta-analysis was used. Time-on-treatment was derived from KEYNOTE-048 or approximated using network meta-analysis progression-free survival estimates. Costs included first-line and subsequent treatments, disease management, adverse events, and terminal care costs. Utilities were derived from the KEYNOTE-048 Euro-QoL five-dimension data and using a US algorithm.

RESULTS:

In the CPS ≥1 R/M HNSCC population, pembrolizumab monotherapy was dominant vs. EXTREME and TPEx regimens, and cost-effective (at $100,000/QALY threshold) vs. platinum+5-FU ($86,827/QALY) and cisplatin + paclitaxel ($81,473/QALY). Pembrolizumab combination therapy in the overall R/M HNSCC population was dominant vs. TPEx regimen, and cost-effective vs. EXTREME regimen ($1769/QALY), platinum+5-FU ($81,989/QALY), and cisplatin + paclitaxel ($89,505/QALY). Sensitivity analyses showed a high cost-effectiveness probability for pembrolizumab at the $100,000/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with CPS ≥1, and pembrolizumab combination therapy in the overall R/M HNSCC population is cost-effective from the perspective of the US payers.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Cisplatine / Tumeurs de la tête et du cou Type d'étude: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Humans Pays/Région comme sujet: America do norte Langue: En Journal: J Med Econ Sujet du journal: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Cisplatine / Tumeurs de la tête et du cou Type d'étude: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Limites: Humans Pays/Région comme sujet: America do norte Langue: En Journal: J Med Econ Sujet du journal: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique
...