Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AN INTER-COMPARISON OF PASSIVE DOSEMETERS FOR TERRESTRIAL GAMMA RADIATION MEASUREMENTS.
Ding, Yanqiu; Wang, Kaiyi; Gao, Pin; Hu, Aiying; Guo, Wen; Han, Yanqing.
Affiliation
  • Ding Y; Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China.
  • Wang K; Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China.
  • Gao P; Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China.
  • Hu A; Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China.
  • Guo W; Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China.
  • Han Y; Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 198(16): 1205-1209, 2022 Sep 22.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35849034
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the measurement method of passive dosemeters for terrestrial gamma radiation measurements. An inter-comparison of passive dosemeters for terrestrial gamma radiation measurements was organized alternately by the Japan Chemical Analysis Center, National Institute for Radiological Protection of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Radiation Monitoring Technical Center of Ministry of Environmental Protection every 2 years. The procedures and exposure conditions of the field-exposure and reference irradiation test were provided by the organizer. During 2019-2020, the En values of Field-1 and Field-2 in three laboratories were lower than 1.0 and assigned 'acceptable' according to inter-comparison criteria. After the correction of the fading effect of dosemeter material, the En values of reference irradiation test (0.301 mGy, 1.000 mGy) in three laboratories were lower than 1.0 and assigned 'acceptable'.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Radioprotection / Contrôle des radiations / Exposition professionnelle Langue: En Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Radioprotection / Contrôle des radiations / Exposition professionnelle Langue: En Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine