Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A machine learning approach to predicting early and late postoperative reintubation.
Koretsky, Mathew J; Brovman, Ethan Y; Urman, Richard D; Tsai, Mitchell H; Cheney, Nick.
Affiliation
  • Koretsky MJ; College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, University of Vermont, 82 University Place, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA. mathew.koretsky1@gmail.com.
  • Brovman EY; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
  • Urman RD; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Tsai MH; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
  • Cheney N; Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, 82 University Place, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 37(2): 501-508, 2023 04.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057069
ABSTRACT
Accurate estimation of surgical risks is important for informing the process of shared decision making and informed consent. Postoperative reintubation (POR) is a severe complication that is associated with postoperative morbidity. Previous studies have divided POR into early POR (within 72 h of surgery) and late POR (within 30 days of surgery). Using data provided by American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), machine learning classification models (logistic regression, random forest classification, and gradient boosting classification) were utilized to develop scoring systems for the prediction of combined, early, and late POR. The risk factors included in each scoring system were narrowed down from a set of 37 pre and perioperative factors. The scoring systems developed from the logistic regression models demonstrated strong performance in terms of both accuracy and discrimination across the different POR outcomes (Average Brier score, 0.172; Average c-statistic, 0.852). These results were only marginally worse than prediction using the full set of risk variables (Average Brier score, 0.145; Average c-statistic, 0.870). While more work needs to be done to identify clinically relevant differences between the early and late POR outcomes, the scoring systems provided here can be used by surgeons and patients to improve the quality of care overall.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Complications postopératoires / Apprentissage machine Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Sujet du journal: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Complications postopératoires / Apprentissage machine Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Sujet du journal: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique
...