Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Children's and young People's diabetes services: What works well and what doesn't?
Kime, N; Zwolinsky, S; Pringle, A; Campbell, F.
Affiliation
  • Kime N; Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom.
  • Zwolinsky S; West Yorkshire and Harrogate Cancer Alliance, White Rose House, West Parade, Wakefield, WF1 1LT, United Kingdom.
  • Pringle A; Sport, Outdoor & Exercise Science, School of Health Sciences and Human Sciences Research Centre, College of Science and Engineering, University of Derby, Derby, DE22 1GB, United Kingdom.
  • Campbell F; Children's Diabetes Centre, Level 1, Multi-Speciality Outpatients, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Public Health Pract (Oxf) ; 3: 100272, 2022 Jun.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36101750
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The first year of care, post diagnosis, is pivotal for children and young people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. This study evaluated a paediatric type 1 diabetes intervention, the 'First Year of Care', designed to maximise the care that newly diagnosed children and young people received. Study

design:

An observational mixed methods approach, underpinned by the Influencer Framework.

Methods:

A purposeful, non-probability sample of children and young people with type 1 diabetes and their families, and healthcare professionals were invited to take part. Data were collected through medical records of thirty-two newly diagnosed children and young people, plus thirty seven semi-structured interviews and exposure to six concurrent sources of influence through a questionnaire.

Results:

For many participants, HbA1c levels were within the optimal range by the time of their first clinic visit post-diagnosis and continued to stay within this range throughout the first year of care. Healthcare professionals prioritised the 'First Year of Care' intervention. Positive practices included a cohesive and collaborative approach; patient-centred care; latest health technology and embedded structured education. Unusually, different multidisciplinary team members were located in one place.Data indicated statistically significant differences in total sources of influence score (t [35] = 2.331, p = 0.026); healthcare professionals' scores were higher compared to children. This suggests that children and young people have less social capital to self-manage their diabetes effectively. Greater encouragement and assistance from healthcare professionals and social networks may be needed.

Conclusions:

This paper identifies contemporary issues in practice and highlights the strengths and challenges for a paediatric diabetes intervention. The findings confirm the potential of layered approaches to behaviour change in managing type 1 diabetes across multiple domains of influence. Our study strongly suggests enhancing social motivation among children, young people and families to support successful long-term engagement in a paediatric diabetes intervention. Findings demonstrate healthcare professionals are key in delivering the intervention, along with opportunities to improve patient care, experience and outcomes.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Langue: En Journal: Public Health Pract (Oxf) Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Royaume-Uni

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Langue: En Journal: Public Health Pract (Oxf) Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Royaume-Uni