Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Early 2020 among Rhode Island Pregnancies.
Hardy, Erica J; Palomaki, Glenn E; Sung, C James; Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M.
Affiliation
  • Hardy EJ; Department of Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA ehardy@wihri.org.
  • Palomaki GE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Sung CJ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Lambert-Messerlian GM; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Ann Clin Lab Sci ; 52(5): 788-795, 2022 Sep.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36261192
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Limited data are available on the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays and data collected during pregnancy vary widely. The objective of this study was to estimate the seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant individuals in Rhode Island and to evaluate whether the prevalence differed by month of collection, age, county of residence, or economic status as estimated by zip code.

METHODS:

Pre-pandemic (2019) and early pandemic (2020) serum samples, collected for prenatal screening between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation, were analyzed utilizing two SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) automated assays that targeted the viral nucleocapsid (anti-N) or spike (anti-S) receptor binding domain proteins.

RESULTS:

Among 756 pre-pandemic samples, one anti-S IgG and 13 anti-N IgG were identified. No samples were positive for both. Among 787 pandemic specimens, 16 (2.03%) were positive for both anti-N IgG and anti-S IgG. When stratified by month of collection, there was a significant increase in seropositivity rate (p=0.023). Seropositivity rates were associated with lower income levels (p=0.08) but this was not statistically significant. No trend by maternal age was found (p=0.70).

CONCLUSIONS:

When a positive result was defined as both anti-N IgG and anti-S IgG, false positives were unlikely. Based on this methodology, serology could be utilized to monitor infection trends during pregnancy.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés
Recherche sur Google
Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type d'étude: Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limites: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Pays/Région comme sujet: America do norte Langue: En Journal: Ann Clin Lab Sci Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique
Recherche sur Google
Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type d'étude: Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limites: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Pays/Région comme sujet: America do norte Langue: En Journal: Ann Clin Lab Sci Année: 2022 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique
...