Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The comparative effects of erythromycin and amikacin on acute respiratory Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.
Yazdanian, Mohsen; Barzegar, Peyman Esmaeili Fard; Ranjbar, Reza; Tahmasebi, Elahe; Tebyaniyan, Hamid; Barzegar, Keyvan Esmaeili Fard; Hayati, Farhad Zadeh; Farjanikish, Ghasem.
Affiliation
  • Yazdanian M; Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Barzegar PEF; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
  • Ranjbar R; Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Tahmasebi E; School of Dentistry, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Tebyaniyan H; Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Barzegar KEF; Islimic Azade University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Hayati FZ; Department of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Farjanikish G; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
Vet Med Sci ; 9(2): 867-875, 2023 03.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318447
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

One of the most common causes of pneumonia is Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). As with other microbial pathogens, this bacterium tends to develop resistance to various antibiotics. Amikacin and erythromycin, which are from the aminoglycoside and macrolide antibiotic families, are used to treat respiratory infections caused by P. aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES:

This study explored whether amikacin, erythromycin or a combination of both works better against P. aeruginosa acute lung infection.

METHODS:

For this study, 32 rats were used. The trachea of rats was exposed aseptically and their lung was infected with P. aeruginosa through trachea. Then, according to the group, they received amikacin, erythromycin or a combination of both for 1 week. Finally, they were euthanised on the 3rd and 7th days post-infection. The macroscopic and microscopic evaluations of the lungs, kidney and liver were performed. The right lung was collected for in vivo bacteriological analysis.

RESULTS:

The amikacin group (A group) had a statistically significantly lower macroscopic and microscopic scores than the other groups (p < 0.05). In vivo bacteriological test revealed that the A group had significantly lower lung bacterial load (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

In summary, it was concluded that amikacin could help alleviate the respiratory infection caused by P. aeruginosa solely, and it was more effective than erythromycin.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Pneumopathie infectieuse / Infections à Pseudomonas / Infections de l&apos;appareil respiratoire Limites: Animals Langue: En Journal: Vet Med Sci Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Iran Pays de publication: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Pneumopathie infectieuse / Infections à Pseudomonas / Infections de l&apos;appareil respiratoire Limites: Animals Langue: En Journal: Vet Med Sci Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Iran Pays de publication: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM