Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of a COVID-19 vaccination protocol for unhoused patients in the emergency department.
Ford, James S; Rouleau, Sam G; Wagner, Jenny L; Adams, Christopher B; May, Larissa S; Parikh, Aman K; Holmes, James F.
Affiliation
  • Ford JS; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Rouleau SG; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Wagner JL; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Adams CB; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • May LS; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Parikh AK; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Holmes JF; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: jfholmes@ucdavis.edu.
Vaccine ; 41(9): 1611-1615, 2023 02 24.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36732166
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an emergency department (ED)-based Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination protocol in a population of unhoused patients.

METHODS:

On June 10, 2021, a best practice alert (BPA) was implemented that fired when an ED provider opened the charts of unhoused patients and prompted the provider to order COVID-19 vaccination for eligible patients. We downloaded electronic medical record data of patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine in the ED between June 10, 2021 and August 26, 2021. The outcomes of interest were the number of unhoused, and the total number of patients vaccinated for COVID-19 during the study period. Data were described with simple descriptive statistics.

RESULTS:

There were 25,871 patient encounters in 19,992 unique patients (mean 1.3 visits/patient) in the emergency department during the study period. There were 1,474 (6% of total ED population) visits in 1,085 unique patients who were unhoused (mean 1.4 visits/patient). The BPA fired in 1,046 unhoused patient encounters (71% of PEH encounters) and was accepted in 79 (8%). Forty-three unhoused patients were vaccinated as a result of the BPA (4% of BPA fires) and 18 unhoused patients were vaccinated without BPA prompting. An additional 76 domiciled patients were vaccinated in the ED.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementing an ED-based COVID-19 vaccination program is feasible, however, only a small number of patients underwent COVID-19 vaccination. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of using the ED as a setting for COVID-19 vaccination.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Vaccins contre la COVID-19 / COVID-19 Type d'étude: Guideline Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Vaccine Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Vaccins contre la COVID-19 / COVID-19 Type d'étude: Guideline Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Vaccine Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique