Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Secondary Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding Is Often Imperfect: A National, Population-Based Cohort Study of 3592 Patients.
Hagström, Hannes; Shang, Ying; Tapper, Elliot B; Wester, Axel; Widman, Linnea.
Affiliation
  • Hagström H; Division of Hepatology, Department of Upper GI Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: hannes.hagstrom@ki.se.
  • Shang Y; Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Tapper EB; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Wester A; Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Widman L; Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(13): 3336-3345.e2, 2023 12.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37192714
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Secondary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding is important to improve prognosis, but uptake of guidelines is unknown in a real-world setting. Here, we determined the proportion of patients receiving appropriate nonselective beta-blocker treatment and repeat upper endoscopy after a first episode of esophageal variceal bleeding within a reasonable time frame.

METHODS:

Population-based registers were used to identify all patients with a first episode of esophageal variceal bleeding in Sweden from 2006 to 2020. Crosslinkage between registers was performed to receive information on the cumulative incidence of patients with a dispensation of nonselective beta-blockers and repeat upper endoscopy within 120 days from baseline. Overall mortality was investigated using Cox regression.

RESULTS:

In total, 3592 patients were identified, with a median age of 63 (interquartile range, 54-71) years. The cumulative incidence of a dispensation of nonselective beta-blockers and a repeat endoscopy within 120 days was 33%. A total of 77% received either of these treatments. Overall mortality was high, with 65% of patients dying after esophageal variceal bleeding during the full follow-up period (median 1.7 years). We observed an improved overall mortality during the later years of the study period (adjusted hazard ratio for the 2016-2020 period compared with the 2006-2010 period, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.89). Patients with receipt of nonselective beta-blockers and repeat upper endoscopy had better overall survival compared with those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS:

Secondary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding has not been widely undertaken, with many patients not receiving guideline-supported interventions within a reasonable time frame. This highlights a need to raise awareness on appropriate prevention strategies to clinicians and patients.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Varices oesophagiennes et gastriques / Hémorragie gastro-intestinale Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Sujet du journal: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Année: 2023 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Varices oesophagiennes et gastriques / Hémorragie gastro-intestinale Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Sujet du journal: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Année: 2023 Type de document: Article