Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Communicating Emotion: Vocal Expression of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss Compared With That of Normal Hearing Peers.
de Jong, Tjeerd J; Hakkesteegt, Marieke M; van der Schroeff, Marc P; Vroegop, Jantien L.
Affiliation
  • de Jong TJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ear Hear ; 45(1): 72-80, 2024.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316994
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Emotional prosody is known to play an important role in social communication. Research has shown that children with cochlear implants (CCIs) may face challenges in their ability to express prosody, as their expressions may have less distinct acoustic contrasts and therefore may be judged less accurately. The prosody of children with milder degrees of hearing loss, wearing hearing aids, has sparsely been investigated. More understanding of the prosodic expression by children with hearing loss, hearing aid users in particular, could create more awareness among healthcare professionals and parents on limitations in social communication, which awareness may lead to more targeted rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare the prosodic expression potential of children wearing hearing aids (CHA) with that of CCIs and children with normal hearing (CNH).

DESIGN:

In this prospective experimental study, utterances of pediatric hearing aid users, cochlear implant users, and CNH containing emotional expressions (happy, sad, and angry) were recorded during a reading task. Of the utterances, three acoustic properties were calculated fundamental frequency (F0), variance in fundamental frequency (SD of F0), and intensity. Acoustic properties of the utterances were compared within subjects and between groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 75 children were included (CHA 26, CCI 23, and CNH 26). Participants were between 7 and 13 years of age. The 15 CCI with congenital hearing loss had received the cochlear implant at median age of 8 months. The acoustic patterns of emotions uttered by CHA were similar to those of CCI and CNH. Only in CCI, we found no difference in F0 variation between happiness and anger, although an intensity difference was present. In addition, CCI and CHA produced poorer happy-sad contrasts than did CNH.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings of this study suggest that on a fundamental, acoustic level, both CHA and CCI have a prosodic expression potential that is almost on par with normal hearing peers. However, there were some minor limitations observed in the prosodic expression of these children, it is important to determine whether these differences are perceptible to listeners and could affect social communication. This study sets the groundwork for more research that will help us fully understand the implications of these findings and how they may affect the communication abilities of these children. With a clearer understanding of these factors, we can develop effective ways to help improve their communication skills.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Perception de la parole / Implants cochléaires / Surdité / Perte d'audition Limites: Child / Humans / Infant Langue: En Journal: Ear Hear Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Perception de la parole / Implants cochléaires / Surdité / Perte d'audition Limites: Child / Humans / Infant Langue: En Journal: Ear Hear Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas