Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Helping patient educators meet health literacy needs: End-user testing and iterative development of an innovative health literacy editing tool.
Ayre, Julie; Muscat, Danielle M; Mac, Olivia; Bonner, Carissa; Dunn, Adam G; Dalmazzo, Jason; Mouwad, Dana; McCaffery, Kirsten.
Affiliation
  • Ayre J; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Muscat DM; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Mac O; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Bonner C; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Dunn AG; Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Dalmazzo J; Discipline of Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Mouwad D; Discipline of Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • McCaffery K; Western Sydney Local Health District, Health Literacy Hub, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
PEC Innov ; 2: 100162, 2023 Dec.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37384149
Objective: The Sydney Health Literacy Lab (SHeLL) Editor is an online text-editing tool that provides real-time assessment and feedback on written health information (assesses grade reading score, complex language, passive voice). This study aimed to explore how the design could be further enhanced to help health information providers interpret and act on automated feedback. Methods: The prototype was iteratively refined across four rounds of user-testing with health services staff (N = 20). Participants took part in online interviews and a brief follow-up survey using validated usability scales (System Usability Scale, Technology Acceptance Model). After each round, Yardley's (2021) optimisation criteria guided which changes would be implemented. Results: Participants rated the Editor as having adequate usability (M = 82.8 out of 100, SD = 13.5). Most modifications sought to reduce information overload (e.g. simplifying instructions for new users) or make feedback motivating and actionable (e.g. using frequent incremental feedback to highlight changes to the text altered assessment scores). Conclusion: terative user-testing was critical to balancing academic values and the practical needs of the Editor's target users. The final version emphasises actionable real-time feedback and not just assessment. Innovation: The Editor is a new tool that will help health information providers apply health literacy principles to written text.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Langue: En Journal: PEC Innov Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie Pays de publication: Pays-Bas

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Langue: En Journal: PEC Innov Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie Pays de publication: Pays-Bas