Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world Outcomes and Predictive Biomarkers for 177Lutetium Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Treatment in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Observational Study.
Kafka, Mona; Horninger, Andreas; di Santo, Gianpaolo; Virgolini, Irene; Neuwirt, Hannes; Unterrainer, Lena M; Kunte, Sophie C; Deiss, Emil; Paffenholz, Pia; Heidenreich, Axel; Rasul, Sazan; Einspieler, Holger; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Rajwa, Pawel; Dozauer, Robert; Tsaur, Igor; Medlock, Ellen; Rölz, Niklas; Rausch, Steffen; la Fougère, Christian; Trautwein, Nils; Roesch, Marie C; Merseburger, Axel S; Zattoni, Fabio; Sepulcri, Matteo; Ladurner, Michael; Bektic, Jasmin; Gandaglia, Giorgio; Horninger, Wolfgang; Heidegger, Isabel.
Affiliation
  • Kafka M; Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Horninger A; Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • di Santo G; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Virgolini I; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Neuwirt H; Department of Internal Medicine IV - Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Unterrainer LM; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Kunte SC; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Deiss E; Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Paffenholz P; Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Heidenreich A; Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Rasul S; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Einspieler H; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles Un
  • Rajwa P; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
  • Dozauer R; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Tsaur I; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Medlock E; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Rölz N; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Rausch S; Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • la Fougère C; Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Trautwein N; Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Roesch MC; Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Merseburger AS; Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Zattoni F; Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Sepulcri M; Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
  • Ladurner M; Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Bektic J; Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Gandaglia G; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Horninger W; Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Heidegger I; Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: isabel-maria.heidegger@i-med.ac.at.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 2023 Aug 19.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604763
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The European Association of Urology guidelines include the lutetium-177 (177Lu) PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand as a therapy option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A major challenge in clinical practice is to pursue a personalized treatment approach based on robust predictive biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the performance of 177Lu PSMA in real-world practice and to elaborate clinical biomarkers for evaluating treatment responses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

We conducted a retrospective observational study including 233 patients with mCRPC treated with 177Lu PSMA in eight high-volume European centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters during and after 177Lu PSMA treatment were documented. Correlations to treatment response were analyzed using χ2 and log-rank tests, with differences between groups with and without disease progression calculated using a Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were measured using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease of ≥30% was observed in 41.7%, 63.5%, and 77.8% of patients after the first, second, and third treatment cycle, respectively. Restaging performed via PSMA positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed that 33.7% of patients had an imaging-based response, including two patients with a complete response, while 13.4% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5 mo and the median time until the start of a consecutive antineoplastic therapy was 8.5 mo. Of importance, a PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles of 177Lu PSMA (1 cycle p = 0.0003; 2 cycles p = 0.004), absolute PSA after the first three cycles (1 cycle p = 0.011; 2 cycles p = 0.0005; 3 cycles p = 0.002), and a PSA doubling time >6 mo (p = 0.009) were significantly correlated to treatment response. Furthermore, gamma-glutamyl transferase ≤31 U/L at the start of 177Lu PSMA therapy was correlated with 1.5 times higher risk of progression for patients without but not with visceral metastases (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS:

177Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in mCRPC in the real-world setting. A PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles is an early marker of response that can be easily implemented in clinical practice. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

177Lu PSMA is a radioactive agent approved for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. We reviewed its use outside of clinical trials for patients treated at eight European centers. We found that 177Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in real-world practice. A PSA (prostate-specific antigen) decrease of ≥30% after the first two therapy cycles is an early indicator of response to treatment and can be used in personalizing treatments for patients.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Langue: En Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Autriche

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Langue: En Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Autriche