Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: significantly different characteristics and outcomes in shoulders with intact vs. torn rotator cuff.
Nové-Josserand, Laurent; Nerot, Cecile; Colotte, Philippe; Guery, Jacques; Godenèche, Arnaud.
Affiliation
  • Nové-Josserand L; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France; SoFEC - French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.
  • Nerot C; SoFEC - French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France; Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
  • Colotte P; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France; SoFEC - French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.
  • Guery J; SoFEC - French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France; Polyclinique du Val de Loire, ELSAN, Nevers, France.
  • Godenèche A; SoFEC - French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 33(4): 850-862, 2024 Apr.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37633591
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with and without rotator cuff (RC) tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears.

METHODS:

We reviewed records of all patients who received RSA for primary OA or secondary OA. All patients had preoperative radiographs, computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their shoulders to assess their etiology, glenoid morphology, and fatty infiltration. Pre- and postoperative (at minimum follow-up of 2 years) Constant scores and range of motion were compared between patients who had RSA for primary OA with and without RC tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears.

RESULTS:

Of the initial cohort of 605 shoulders (583 patients), 153 were lost to follow-up (25.3%), 25 required revision with implant removal (4.1%), and 13 died of causes unrelated to the surgery (2.1%), and left a final cohort of 414 patients. Of the final cohort, 97 had primary OA with intact RC, 62 had primary OA with RC tears, and 255 had secondary OA. Postoperative Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC (73.8 ± 14.3), compared with both primary OA with RC tears (66.1 ± 14.6, P < .001) and secondary OA (64.1 ± 14.8, P < .001). There were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores between primary OA with RC tears and secondary OA.

CONCLUSION:

At 2 or more years following RSA, Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC, compared to either primary OA with RC tears or secondary OA, whereas there were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores of shoulders that had primary OA with RC tears vs. secondary OA. The authors recommend distinguishing primary OA with intact RC from primary OA with RC tears, as the two have considerably different characteristics and prognosis following RSA.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Arthrose / Articulation glénohumérale / Lésions de la coiffe des rotateurs / Arthroplastie de l&apos;épaule Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Sujet du journal: ORTOPEDIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: France

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Arthrose / Articulation glénohumérale / Lésions de la coiffe des rotateurs / Arthroplastie de l&apos;épaule Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Sujet du journal: ORTOPEDIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: France