Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CutFEM forward modeling for EEG source analysis.
Erdbrügger, Tim; Westhoff, Andreas; Höltershinken, Malte; Radecke, Jan-Ole; Buschermöhle, Yvonne; Buyx, Alena; Wallois, Fabrice; Pursiainen, Sampsa; Gross, Joachim; Lencer, Rebekka; Engwer, Christian; Wolters, Carsten.
Affiliation
  • Erdbrügger T; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Westhoff A; Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Höltershinken M; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Radecke JO; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Buschermöhle Y; Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Buyx A; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Wallois F; Center of Brain, Behaviour and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Pursiainen S; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Gross J; Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Lencer R; Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Engwer C; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
  • Wolters C; Computing Sciences Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 17: 1216758, 2023.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37694172
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Source analysis of Electroencephalography (EEG) data requires the computation of the scalp potential induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called EEG forward problem is based on an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head, represented by a partial differential equation which can be solved using the finite element method (FEM). FEM offers flexibility when modeling anisotropic tissue conductivities but requires a volumetric discretization, a mesh, of the head domain. Structured hexahedral meshes are easy to create in an automatic fashion, while tetrahedral meshes are better suited to model curved geometries. Tetrahedral meshes, thus, offer better accuracy but are more difficult to create.

Methods:

We introduce CutFEM for EEG forward simulations to integrate the strengths of hexahedra and tetrahedra. It belongs to the family of unfitted finite element methods, decoupling mesh and geometry representation. Following a description of the method, we will employ CutFEM in both controlled spherical scenarios and the reconstruction of somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Results:

CutFEM outperforms competing FEM approaches with regard to numerical accuracy, memory consumption, and computational speed while being able to mesh arbitrarily touching compartments.

Discussion:

CutFEM balances numerical accuracy, computational efficiency, and a smooth approximation of complex geometries that has previously not been available in FEM-based EEG forward modeling.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Qualitative_research Langue: En Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Type d'étude: Qualitative_research Langue: En Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne
...