Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study.
Walter, Christian; Sagheb, Keyvan; Blatt, Sebastian; Klein, Marcus Oliver; Herrmann, Jan; Kleinheinz, Johannes; Al-Nawas, Bilal.
Affiliation
  • Walter C; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Mediplus Clinic, Haifa-Allee 20, 55128, Mainz, Germany. walter@mainz-mkg.de.
  • Sagheb K; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. walter@mainz-mkg.de.
  • Blatt S; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
  • Klein MO; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
  • Herrmann J; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Private Dental Office, Stresemannstraße 7-9, 40210, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Kleinheinz J; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Private Dental Office, Lothar-Streit-Straße 10B, 08056, Zwickau, Germany.
  • Al-Nawas B; Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Int J Implant Dent ; 9(1): 32, 2023 09 19.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37725234
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Narrow-diameter implants facilitate single-tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant with a 2.9 mm diameter in the clinical practice setting. This study was retrospectively registered on March 1st, 2016 (NCT02699866).

METHODS:

Implants were placed in partially healed extraction sockets of the central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single-tooth replacement. The primary outcome was to assess implant survival at 12 months after placement. Secondary outcomes included implant success, pink esthetic score, marginal bone-level changes, and safety.

RESULTS:

Twenty four males and 17 females with a mean age of 44.5 (± 18.3 standard deviation) received the implant. Three out of 41 implants were lost yielding a survival rate of 92.7% (95%-CI 79.0%; 97.6%) at 1 year. One patient reported an ongoing foreign body sensation, pain, and/or dysesthesia at month 12. The average pink esthetic score at 6 months was 11.2 (95%-CI 10.5; 11.9). The bone level was stable with a mean bone-level change of-0.3 mm (± 0.42 mm standard deviation) at 1 year after implantation. No serious adverse events or adverse device events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of a 2.9 mm diameter bone-level-tapered implant is a safe and reliable treatment option for narrow tooth gaps at the indicated locations. Overall performance and good survival rates support their use in cases, where wider implants are unsuitable.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Implants dentaires Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limites: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Int J Implant Dent Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Implants dentaires Type d'étude: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limites: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: Int J Implant Dent Année: 2023 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Allemagne