Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conservative Management of Penile and Urethral Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review.
Shieh, Christine; Hakam, Nizar; Pearce, Robert J; Nagpal, Meera; Ghaffar, Umar; Guzman, José L; Abbasi, Behzad; Shaw, Nathan M; Jones, Charles P; Breyer, Benjamin N.
Affiliation
  • Shieh C; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Hakam N; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Pearce RJ; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Nagpal M; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Ghaffar U; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Guzman JL; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Abbasi B; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Shaw NM; Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Jones CP; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Breyer BN; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Urol ; 211(3): 354-363, 2024 Mar.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38079459
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of currently available conservative management options for penile and urethral lichen sclerosus. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review of existing literature on lichen sclerosus was conducted utilizing the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. References were assessed for relevance to nonsurgical management of male genital lichen sclerosus by title and abstract by 3 independent reviewers, then reviewed in full and in duplicate by 5 independent reviewers.

RESULTS:

Seventeen studies describing conservative management of histologically confirmed penile and urethral lichen sclerosus in male patients were included in the final review. We present available evidence supporting the use of 4 major treatment modalities represented in the existing literature topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus, platelet-rich plasma, and CO2 laser. We also briefly discuss the limited studies on the use of oral acitretin and polydeoxyribonucleotide injections. Outcomes assessed include symptoms, clinical appearance, quality of life, sexual satisfaction, adverse effects, and long-term efficacy of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of conservative management of penile and urethral lichen sclerosus, with current literature supporting the use of other therapies such as tacrolimus and platelet-rich plasma as alternatives or adjuvant treatments when escalation of treatment is necessary. Future research should further explore the efficacy and safety of newer therapies through additional controlled clinical trials in the targeted population.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Sténose de l'urètre / Lichen scléroatrophique Type d'étude: Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: J Urol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Sténose de l'urètre / Lichen scléroatrophique Type d'étude: Systematic_reviews Limites: Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: J Urol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article