Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance and safety of diagnostic EUS FNA/FNB and therapeutic ERCP in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer - results from a population-based, prospective cohort study.
Farnes, Ingvild; Paulsen, Vemund; Verbeke, Caroline Sofie; Tønnesen, Christer Julseth; Aabakken, Lars; Labori, Knut Jørgen.
Affiliation
  • Farnes I; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Paulsen V; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Verbeke CS; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Tønnesen CJ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Aabakken L; Department of Pathology, Oslo University HospitalOslo, Norway.
  • Labori KJ; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 59(4): 496-502, 2024 Apr.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126766
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS FNA/FNB) and potential endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary decompression are indicated in patients with pancreatic cancer before initation of primary chemotherapy. This study aims to investigate the performance and safety of these two procedures in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Methods:

Endoscopy and pathology reports, and hospital records of consecutive patients with a radiological diagnosis of BRPC/LAPC included in a population based, protocol-driven study (NORPACT-2) were reviewed.

Results:

Of 251 patients, 223 (88.9%) underwent EUS-FNA/FNB, and 133 (53%) underwent ERCP. Repeated EUS attempts were performed in 33 (14.8%), eight (3.6%), and four (1.8%) patients. FNA was performed in 155 procedures, FNB in 30, and combined EUS-FNA/FNB in 83. Diagnostic accuracy was 86.1% for first EUS-FNA/FNB. The cumulative diagnostic accuracy for all attempts was 96%. False positive rate for malignancy was 0.9%. Of a total of 149 ERCP procedures, 122 (81.9%) were successful, and 27 (18.1%) were unsuccessful. Success rate of first ERCP attempt was 80.5% (107/133). Sixteen patients (12%) underwent a second attempt with a success rate of 93.8% (15 of 16). Combined EUS and ERCP was performed in 41 patients. Complications occurred in eight procedures (3%) after EUS-FNA/FNB, 23 procedures (15.3%) after ERCP, and four (9.8%) patients after combined EUS-FNA/FNB and ERCP.

Conclusion:

EUS-FNA/FNB and ERCP with biliary stenting in patients with BRPC/LAPC demonstrated acceptable performance and safety. Repeat procedures were performed with high success rates. Same session EUS-FNA/FNB and ERCP for biliary decompression is safe.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs du pancréas / Adénocarcinome Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Norvège

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs du pancréas / Adénocarcinome Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Norvège