Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decisions and prompts to screen for cervical, bowel, and breast cancer.
Anderson, Laura E; Collins, Katelyn E; Myers, Larry; Ireland, Michael J; Omar, Mariam; Drummond, Allanah; Goodwin, Belinda C.
Affiliation
  • Anderson LE; National Centre for Youth Substance Use, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: l.anderson3@uq.edu.au.
  • Collins KE; Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia; School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
  • Myers L; Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia; School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
  • Ireland MJ; Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia; School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
  • Omar M; Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia.
  • Drummond A; School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
  • Goodwin BC; Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia; Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Patient Educ Couns ; 122: 108174, 2024 May.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38295667
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate what makes Australians decide to screen and follow through for breast, cervical, and bowel cancer population screening programs.

METHODS:

A convenience sample (N = 962) answered open-text questions about their decision to screen and what prompted them to act in an online survey. Open text responses were coded based on shared meaning using content analysis. Frequencies of each code were calculated.

RESULTS:

For breast and cervical screening, decisions were commonly based on screening being routine (32.58%breast and 35.19%cervical) or receiving a reminder (20.53% breast 13.07% cervical), and similarly, common prompts were receiving a reminder (40.68% breast and 29.13% cervical), screening being routine (22.05% breast and 18.65% cervical). Participants reported deciding to screen for bowel cancer due to arrival of home screening test kit (40.50%) or the experience of loved one's cancer (13.57%) and were prompted by arrival of home test kit (23.58%), and convenience (15.72%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Findings can inform the development of interventions targeting non-participants of cancer screening programs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Messages to encourage breast and cervical cancer screening should frame screening as part of regular healthcare routine. Messages to encourage bowel cancer screening should encourage immediate use of the screening kit upon arrival.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs du sein / Tumeurs colorectales / Tumeurs du col de l'utérus / Populations d'Australasie Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies Limites: Female / Humans Pays/Région comme sujet: Oceania Langue: En Journal: Patient Educ Couns / Patient educ. couns / Patient education and counseling Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: Irlande

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs du sein / Tumeurs colorectales / Tumeurs du col de l'utérus / Populations d'Australasie Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies Limites: Female / Humans Pays/Région comme sujet: Oceania Langue: En Journal: Patient Educ Couns / Patient educ. couns / Patient education and counseling Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: Irlande