Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients Lost to Follow-up After Injury: Who are They and What are Their Long-Term Outcomes?
Ruske, Jack; Castillo-Angeles, Manuel; Lamarre, Taylor; Salim, Ali; Jenkins, Kendall; Rembetski, Benjamin E; Kaafarani, Haytham M A; Herrera-Escobar, Juan P; Sanchez, Sabrina E.
Affiliation
  • Ruske J; Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jruske@bu.edu.
  • Castillo-Angeles M; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Lamarre T; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Salim A; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Jenkins K; Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Rembetski BE; Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Kaafarani HMA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Herrera-Escobar JP; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Sanchez SE; Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Surg Res ; 296: 343-351, 2024 Apr.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306940
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Trauma patients are at high risk for loss to follow-up (LTFU) after hospital discharge. We sought to identify risk factors for LTFU and investigate associations between LTFU and long-term health outcomes in the trauma population.

METHODS:

Trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score ≥9 admitted to one of three Level-I trauma centers, 2015-2020, were surveyed via telephone 6 mo after injury. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess factors associated with LTFU and several long-term outcomes.

RESULTS:

Of 3609 patients analyzed, 808 (22.4%) were LTFU. Patients LTFU were more likely to be male (71% versus 61%, P = 0.001), Black (22% versus 14%, P = 0.003), have high school or lower education (50% versus 42%, P = 0.003), be publicly insured (23% versus 13%, P < 0.001), have a penetrating injury (13% versus 8%, P = 0.006), have a shorter length of stay (3.64 d ± 4.09 versus 5.06 ± 5.99, P < 0.001), and be discharged home without assistance (79% versus 50%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, patients who followed up were more likely to require assistance at home (6% versus 11%; odds ratio [OR] 2.23, 1.26-3.92, P = 0.005), have new functional limitations (11% versus 26%; OR 2.91, 1.97-4.31, P = < 0.001), have daily pain (30% versus 48%; OR 2.11, 1.54-2.88, P = < 0.001), and have more injury-related emergency department visits (7% versus 10%; OR 1.93, 1.15-3.22, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS:

Vulnerable populations are more likely to be LTFU after injury. Clinicians should be aware of potential racial and socioeconomic disparities in follow-up care after traumatic injury. Future studies investigating improvement strategies in follow-up care should be considered.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Plaies pénétrantes / Perdus de vue Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: J Surg Res Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Plaies pénétrantes / Perdus de vue Type d'étude: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Female / Humans / Male Langue: En Journal: J Surg Res Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique