Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical evaluation of autonomous robotic-assisted full-arch implant surgery: A 1-year prospective clinical study.
Xie, Rui; Liu, Yuchen; Wei, Hongbo; Zhang, Tingmin; Bai, Shizhu; Zhao, Yimin.
Affiliation
  • Xie R; State Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Liu Y; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Wei H; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Zhang T; Digital Center, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Bai S; State Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Zhao Y; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 35(4): 443-453, 2024 Apr.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318691
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and 1-year clinical follow-up performance of dental implant placement with an autonomous dental implant robot (ADIR) system in full-arch implant surgery. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Twelve patients with edentulous arches or final dentition received 102 implants using the ADIR system. Global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and global angular deviation between the planned and actual implants were calculated after surgery. Data were statistically analyzed for factors including jaws, implant positions, patient sequences, implant systems, and implant length. Surgery duration was recorded. Patients were followed for 3 months and 1 year after surgery. Periodontal parameters, buccal bone thickness (BBT), and facial vertical bone wall peak (IP-FC) were recorded.

RESULTS:

Among the 102 implants, the mean (SD) global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and global angular deviation were 0.53 (0.19) mm, 0.58 (0.17) mm, and 1.83 (0.82)°, respectively. The deviation differences between the mandible and maxilla did not show statistical significance (p > .05). No statistically significant differences were found for the jaws, implant positions, patient sequences, implant systems, and implant length to the deviations (p > .05). The periodontal parameters, the BBT, and IP-FC remained stable during 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION:

The ADIR system showed excellent positional accuracy. The 1-year follow-up after full-arch implant surgery indicated that the ADIR system could achieve promising clinical performance. Additional clinical evidence is requisite to furnish guidelines for the implementation of the ADIR system in full-arch implant surgery.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Implants dentaires / Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur / Interventions chirurgicales robotisées Type d'étude: Guideline Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: Danemark

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Implants dentaires / Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur / Interventions chirurgicales robotisées Type d'étude: Guideline Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Sujet du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: Danemark