Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of high-risk pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: A narrative review.
Rouleau, Samuel G; Casey, Scott D; Kabrhel, Christopher; Vinson, David R; Long, Brit.
Affiliation
  • Rouleau SG; Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Health, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: srouleau@ucdavis.edu.
  • Casey SD; Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center, Vallejo, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: scott.d.casey@kp.org.
  • Kabrhel C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Vascular Emergencies, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: ckabrhel@mgb.org.
  • Vinson DR; Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: drvinson@ucdavis.edu.
  • Long B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: Brit.long@yahoo.com.
Am J Emerg Med ; 79: 1-11, 2024 May.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330877
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a complex, life-threatening condition, and emergency clinicians must be ready to resuscitate and rapidly pursue primary reperfusion therapy. The first-line reperfusion therapy for patients with high-risk PE is systemic thrombolytics (ST). Despite consensus guidelines, only a fraction of eligible patients receive ST for high-risk PE.

OBJECTIVE:

This review provides emergency clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding the management of high-risk PE with an emphasis on ST and other reperfusion therapies to address the gap between practice and guideline recommendations.

DISCUSSION:

High-risk PE is defined as PE that causes hemodynamic instability. The high mortality rate and dynamic pathophysiology of high-risk PE make it challenging to manage. Initial stabilization of the decompensating patient includes vasopressor administration and supplemental oxygen or high-flow nasal cannula. Primary reperfusion therapy should be pursued for those with high-risk PE, and consensus guidelines recommend the use of ST for high-risk PE based on studies demonstrating benefit. Other options for reperfusion include surgical embolectomy and catheter directed interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Emergency clinicians must possess an understanding of high-risk PE including the clinical assessment, pathophysiology, management of hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure, and primary reperfusion therapies.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Embolie pulmonaire / Traitement thrombolytique Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Embolie pulmonaire / Traitement thrombolytique Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article
...