Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subjective Complaints and Coping Strategies of Individuals with Reported Low-Frequency Noise Perceptions.
Erdelyi, Kristina H; Fuermaier, Anselm B M; Tucha, Lara; Tucha, Oliver; Koerts, Janneke.
Affiliation
  • Erdelyi KH; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Fuermaier ABM; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Tucha L; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
  • Tucha O; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Koerts J; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Rostock, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
J Clin Med ; 13(4)2024 Feb 06.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398249
ABSTRACT

Background:

Subjective everyday hindrances associated with low-frequency noise (LFN) can be high; however, there is still a lot unknown about experienced complaints. This study aims to investigate (1) subjective complaints and (2) coping strategies of individuals reporting everyday hindrances from LFN.

Methods:

Cognition, depressive symptoms, sleeping, fatigue, stress, and coping questionnaires were administered to participants sampled for their LFN complaints (LFN1 = 181), LFN complainants derived from a community sample (LFN2 = 239), and a comparison group without LFN complaints (CG = 410).

Results:

Individuals reporting LFN perceptions reported complaints in all domains and showed a higher proportion of above average symptom severity compared to the CG. Most complaints were reported by the LFN1 group, the least by the CG. However, on some sleeping, fatigue, and stress-related variables, a similar or even higher symptom severity was observed in the LFN2 group. Further, all groups used a similar combination of multiple coping strategies, although the LFN1 group scored higher on support seeking.

Conclusions:

There might be differences in the complaint severity between different LFN subgroups and future investigations of primary and secondary complaints are necessary. Also, more research about the use and success of coping strategies for LFN-related hindrances are needed for clear conclusions.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Clin Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas Pays de publication: Suisse

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Clin Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas Pays de publication: Suisse