Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Setup and intra-fractional motion measurements using surface scanning in head and neck cancer radiotherapy- A feasibility study.
Essers, Marion; Mesch, Lennart; Beugeling, Maaike; Dekker, Janita; de Kruijf, Willy.
Affiliation
  • Essers M; Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Mesch L; Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Beugeling M; Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • Dekker J; Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • de Kruijf W; Institute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 29: 100563, 2024 Jan.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38444887
ABSTRACT
Background and

purpose:

Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is applied to improve patient set-up and to monitor intra-fraction motion. Head and neck cancer (H&N) patients are usually fixated using 5-point thermoplastic masks, that are experienced as uncomfortable or even stressful. Therefore, the feasibility of irradiating H&N patients without a mask by using SGRT was examined. Material and

methods:

Nineteen H&N patients were included in a simulation study. Once a week, before the standard treatment, a maskless treatment was simulated, using SGRT for setup and intrafraction motion monitoring. Initial patient setup accuracy and intrafraction motion was determined using ConeBeam CT (CBCT) images as well as SGRT before and after the (simulated) treatment. The clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin for intrafraction motion was calculated. Using patient questionnaires, the patient-friendliness H&N irradiation with and without mask was determined.

Results:

Maskless setup with SGRT and CBCT was as accurate as with a mask. SGRT showed that intrafraction motion was gradual during the treatment. The CTV-PTV margin correcting for intrafraction motion was 1.7 mm for maskless treatment without interventions, and 1.2 mm if corrected for motions > 2 mm. For 19 % of fractions, the intrafraction motion, as detected by both SGRT and CBCT, was larger than 2 mm in at least one direction. Sixteen patients preferred maskless treatment, while 3 worried they would move too much.

Conclusions:

Using SGRT and a standard head rest resulted in a patient-friendly treatment with accurate patient setup and acceptably small intrafraction motion for H&N patients.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas Pays de publication: Pays-Bas

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas Pays de publication: Pays-Bas