Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang, Zi; Ma, Runhua; Li, Xiaoyu; Li, Xiaoye; Xu, Qing; Yao, Yao; Wang, Chunsheng; Lv, Qianzhou.
Affiliation
  • Wang Z; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
  • Ma R; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  • Li X; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
  • Li X; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
  • Xu Q; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
  • Yao Y; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
  • Wang C; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  • Lv Q; Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Int J Surg ; 110(6): 3450-3460, 2024 Jun 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445500
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ticagrelor is reportedly more effective than clopidogrel in preventing atherothrombotic events in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the optimal antiplatelet therapy strategy after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) is yet to be established. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This study was performed using the prospectively-maintained database at our institution. Patients who underwent OPCABG were divided into the clopidogrel and the ticagrelor groups. Propensity score matching analysis was performed between the two groups. The clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of vascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke 1-year after surgery.

RESULTS:

In total, 545 patients completed the entire follow-up assessment. After propensity score matching, 232 patients each were included in the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups. The primary outcome occurred in 7.8 and 4.3% of patients in the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups, respectively ( P =0.113). CYP2C19 variants (*2, *3, and *17) did not impact the clinical outcomes, regardless of the use of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The rates of MACE were significantly lower in patients carrying the ABCB1 C3435T CT/TT genotypes in the ticagrelor group than in those carrying the ABCB1 C3435T CC genotype in the clopidogrel group (1.4 vs. 9.1%, adjusted P =0.030), as well as those carrying the ABCB1 C3435T CC genotype in the ticagrelor group (1.4 vs. 8.9%, adjusted P =0.036). The ABCB1 C3435T CC genotype was significantly associated with the incidence of 1-year MACE (HR=1.558, 95% CI 1.109-2.188, P =0.011). Patients who experienced severe perioperative bleeding exhibited a significantly higher incidence of MACE than those who did not experience severe perioperative bleeding (14.0 vs. 4.9%, adjusted P =0.007).

CONCLUSION:

There was no significant difference in the 1-year MACE between patients receiving clopidogrel and those receiving ticagrelor after OPCABG. Notably, The ABCB1 C3435T CC genotype was related to a higher risk of MACE.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Antiagrégants plaquettaires / Pontage coronarien à coeur battant / Clopidogrel / Ticagrélor Limites: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Int J Surg Année: 2024 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Antiagrégants plaquettaires / Pontage coronarien à coeur battant / Clopidogrel / Ticagrélor Limites: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Int J Surg Année: 2024 Type de document: Article