Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma - A phase II randomised trial.
Haakensen, Vilde Drageset; Öjlert, Åsa Kristina; Thunold, Solfrid; Farooqi, Saima; Nowak, Anna K; Chin, Wee L; Grundberg, Oscar; Szejniuk, Weronika Maria; Cedres, Susana; Sørensen, Jens Benn; Dalen, Tonje Sofie; Lund-Iversen, Marius; Bjaanæs, Maria; Helland, Åslaug.
Affiliation
  • Haakensen VD; Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Öjlert ÅK; Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Thunold S; Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Farooqi S; Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Nowak AK; Medical School of The University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia; National Centre for Asbestos-Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Australia; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Chin WL; National Centre for Asbestos-Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Australia; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Grundberg O; Thoracic Oncology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Dept of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Szejniuk WM; Clinical Cancer Research Center & Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Cedres S; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sørensen JB; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Dalen TS; Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lund-Iversen M; Dept of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Bjaanæs M; Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Helland Å; Dept of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Dept of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: aslaug.helland@medisin.uio.no.
Eur J Cancer ; 202: 113973, 2024 May.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447379
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The NIPU-trial investigates the effect of adding the telomerase vaccine UV1 to treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM).

METHODS:

In this phase 2 open-label trial, patients with PM progressing after first-line chemotherapy were randomised to receive ipilimumab and nivolumab alone (arm B) or combined with UV1 (arm A). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by BICR. It was estimated that 69 PFS events were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 with 80% power and a one-sided alpha level of 0.10.

RESULTS:

118 patients were randomised. The median PFS determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.2 months (95%CI 2.9-9.8) in arm A and 4.7 months (95%CI 3.9-7.0) in arm B (HR 1.01, 80%CI 0.75-1.36 P = 0.979), after a median follow-up of 12.5 months (95%CI 9.7-15.6). The investigator-determined median PFS was 4.3 months (95%CI 3.0-6.8) in arm A and 2.9 months (95%CI 2.4-5.5) in arm B (HR 0.60, 80%CI 0.45-0.81 P = 0.025). Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR was 31% in arm A and 16% in arm B (odds ratio 2.44 80%CI 1.35-4.49 P = 0.056). After a median follow-up time of 17.3 months (95%CI 15.8-22.9), the OS was 15.4 months (95%CI 11.1-22.6) in arm A and 11.1 months (95%CI 8.8-18.1) in arm B, (HR 0.73, 80%CI 0.53-1.0, P = 0.197).

CONCLUSION:

The primary endpoint was not met. Predefined analyses of response rates are in favour of adding the vaccine.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs de la plèvre / Telomerase / Mésothéliome malin / Mésothéliome Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Norvège

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs de la plèvre / Telomerase / Mésothéliome malin / Mésothéliome Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Norvège
...