Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Immediate Neuromodulatory Effects between Focal Vibratory and Electrical Sensory Stimulations after Stroke.
Lin, Legeng; Qing, Wanyi; Huang, Yanhuan; Ye, Fuqiang; Rong, Wei; Li, Waiming; Jiao, Jiao; Hu, Xiaoling.
Affiliation
  • Lin L; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Qing W; Research Institute for Smart Ageing (RISA), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Huang Y; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Ye F; Research Institute for Smart Ageing (RISA), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Rong W; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Li W; Research Institute for Smart Ageing (RISA), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Jiao J; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Hu X; Research Institute for Smart Ageing (RISA), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 11(3)2024 Mar 17.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534560
ABSTRACT
Focal vibratory stimulation (FVS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are promising technologies for sensory rehabilitation after stroke. However, the differences between these techniques in immediate neuromodulatory effects on the poststroke cortex are not yet fully understood. In this research, cortical responses in persons with chronic stroke (n = 15) and unimpaired controls (n = 15) were measured by whole-brain electroencephalography (EEG) when FVS and NMES at different intensities were applied transcutaneously to the forearm muscles. Both FVS and sensory-level NMES induced alpha and beta oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex after stroke, significantly exceeding baseline levels (p < 0.05). These oscillations exhibited bilateral sensory deficiency, early adaptation, and contralesional compensation compared to the control group. FVS resulted in a significantly faster P300 response (p < 0.05) and higher theta oscillation (p < 0.05) compared to NMES. The beta desynchronization over the contralesional frontal-parietal area remained during NMES (p > 0.05), but it was significantly weakened during FVS (p < 0.05) after stroke. The results indicated that both FVS and NMES effectively activated the sensorimotor cortex after stroke. However, FVS was particularly effective in eliciting transient involuntary attention, while NMES primarily fostered the cortical responses of the targeted muscles in the contralesional motor cortex.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: Suisse

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: Suisse