Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance.
Raghav Hari Krishna, V S; Kim, Jeonghee; Chang, Shuo-Hsiu; Choe, Yoonsuck; Park, Hangue.
Affiliation
  • Raghav Hari Krishna VS; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Kim J; Department of Electronic Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Department of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Chang SH; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Choe Y; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Park H; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Front Neurosci ; 18: 1249783, 2024.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562307
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Plantar cutaneous augmentation is a promising approach in balance rehabilitation by enhancing motion-dependent sensory feedback. The effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance has been mainly investigated in its passive form (e.g., textured insole) or on lower-limb amputees. In this study, we tested the effect of plantar cutaneous augmentation on balance in its active form (i.e., electrical stimulation) for individuals with intact limbs.

Methods:

Ten healthy subjects participated in the study and were instructed to maintain their balance as long as possible on the balance board, with or without electrotactile feedback evoked on the medial side of the heel, synched with the lateral board sway. Electrotactile feedback was given in two different modes 1) Discrete-mode E-stim as the stimulation on/off by a predefined threshold of lateral board sway and 2) Proportional-mode E-stim as the stimulation frequency proportional to the amount of lateral board sway. All subjects were distracted from the balancing task by the n-back counting task, to test subjects' balancing capability with minimal cognitive involvement.

Results:

Proportional-mode E-stim, along with the n-back counting task, increased the balance time from 1.86 ± 0.03 s to 1.98 ± 0.04 s (p = 0.010). However, discrete-mode E-stim did not change the balance time (p = 0.669). Proportional-mode E-stim also increased the time duration per each swayed state (p = 0.035) while discrete-mode E-stim did not (p = 0.053).

Discussion:

These results suggest that proportional-mode E-stim is more effective than discrete-mode E-stim on improving standing balance. It is perhaps because the proportional electrotactile feedback better mimics the natural tactile sensation of foot pressure than its discrete counterpart.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Neurosci Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique Pays de publication: Suisse

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Neurosci Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique Pays de publication: Suisse