Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Concepts in Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury.
Lindborg, Carter M; Smith, Richard D; Reihl, Alec M; Bacevich, Blake M; Cote, Mark; O'Donnell, Evan; Mazzocca, Augustus D; Hutchinson, Ian.
Affiliation
  • Lindborg CM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Smith RD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Reihl AM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Bacevich BM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Cote M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
  • O'Donnell E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Mazzocca AD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Hutchinson I; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Clin Med ; 13(5)2024 Feb 29.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592250
ABSTRACT

Background:

The management of acromioclavicular joint injuries requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the joint, as well as knowledge of the pertinent physical exam findings and classification to determine an appropriate treatment approach, whether operative or nonoperative. In this article, we present a narrative review of the current state of understanding surrounding these issues. Although there are a large number of options for operative intervention, we additionally present our experience with anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) with imbrication of the deltoid fascia.

Methods:

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on a total of 45 patients who had undergone ACCR between 2003 and 2016 were collected.

Results:

We found that improvements were seen in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) (53 ± 19 to 81 ± 23), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) (6 ± 3 to 12 ± 13), Constant-Murley (CM) (60 ± 18 to 92 ± 8), and Rowe (67 ± 14 to 89 ± 11) and the mean post-operative SANE score was 86 ± 17.

Conclusions:

ACCR has the advantage of addressing both horizontal and vertical stability with good outcomes.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Clin Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Clin Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique