Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Performance Comparison between Different Industrial Real-Time Indoor Localization Systems for Mobile Platforms.
Rebelo, Paulo M; Lima, José; Soares, Salviano Pinto; Moura Oliveira, Paulo; Sobreira, Héber; Costa, Pedro.
Affiliation
  • Rebelo PM; Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
  • Lima J; School of Sciences and Technology-Engineering Department (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
  • Soares SP; Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
  • Moura Oliveira P; CeDRI, SusTEC, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus Sta Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal.
  • Sobreira H; School of Sciences and Technology-Engineering Department (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
  • Costa P; Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(7)2024 Mar 25.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610305
ABSTRACT
The flexibility and versatility associated with autonomous mobile robots (AMR) have facilitated their integration into different types of industries and tasks. However, as the main objective of their implementation on the factory floor is to optimize processes and, consequently, the time associated with them, it is necessary to take into account the environment and congestion to which they are subjected. Localization, on the shop floor and in real time, is an important requirement to optimize the AMRs' trajectory management, thus avoiding livelocks and deadlocks during their movements in partnership with manual forklift operators and logistic trains. Threeof the most commonly used localization techniques in indoor environments (time of flight, angle of arrival, and time difference of arrival), as well as two of the most commonly used indoor localization methods in the industry (ultra-wideband, and ultrasound), are presented and compared in this paper. Furthermore, it identifies and compares three industrial indoor localization solutions Qorvo, Eliko Kio, and Marvelmind, implemented in an industrial mobile platform, which is the main contribution of this paper. These solutions can be applied to both AMRs and other mobile platforms, such as forklifts and logistic trains. In terms of results, the Marvelmind system, which uses an ultrasound method, was the best solution.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Sensors (Basel) Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Portugal Pays de publication: Suisse

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Sensors (Basel) Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Portugal Pays de publication: Suisse