Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy for cancer detection in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen: a multicenter, real-world study.
Liu, Jun-Xiao; Wang, Ze-Yuan; Niu, Shao-Xi; Sai, Xiao-Yong; Zhang, Xu; Zhang, Xue-Pei; Ma, Xin.
Affiliation
  • Liu JX; The Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Wang ZY; Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Niu SX; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
  • Sai XY; Department of Urology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Zhang X; Faculty of Epidemiology and Statistics, The Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Zhang XP; Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
  • Ma X; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Asian J Androl ; 26(4): 377-381, 2024 Jul 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38624201
ABSTRACT
Knowledge about the effect of different prostate biopsy approaches on the prostate cancer detection rate (CDR) in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is limited. We performed this study to compare the CDR among patients who underwent different biopsy approaches and had rising PSA levels in the gray zone. Two hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) and 216 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) between June 2016 and September 2022 were reviewed in this study. In addition, 110 patients who received additional targeted biopsies following the systematic TPB were identified. Clinical parameters, including age, PSA derivative, prostate volume (PV), and needle core count, were recorded. The data were fitted via propensity score matching (PSM), adjusting for potential confounders. TPB outperformed TRB in terms of the CDR (49.6% vs 28.3%, P = 0.001). The clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate was not significantly different between TPB and TRB (78.6% vs 68.8%, P = 0.306). In stratified analysis, TPB outperformed TRB in CDR when the age of patients was 65-75 years (59.0% vs 22.0%, P < 0.001), when PV was 25.00-50.00 ml (63.2% vs 28.3%, P < 0.001), and when needle core count was no more than 12 (58.5% vs 31.5%, P = 0.005). The CDR ( P = 0.712) and detection rate of csPCa ( P = 0.993) did not significantly differ among the systematic, targeted, and combined biopsies. TPB outperformed TRB in CDR for patients with gray-zone PSA. Moreover, performing target biopsy after systematic TPB provided no additional benefits in CDR.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Prostate / Tumeurs de la prostate / Antigène spécifique de la prostate Limites: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Asian J Androl Sujet du journal: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: Chine

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Prostate / Tumeurs de la prostate / Antigène spécifique de la prostate Limites: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Asian J Androl Sujet du journal: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine Pays de publication: Chine