Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Visuospatial working memory in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia: a comparative analysis with Alzheimer's disease using the box task.
Foxe, David; Irish, Muireann; Carrick, James; Cheung, Sau Chi; Teng, Her; Burrell, James R; Kessels, Roy P C; Piguet, Olivier.
Affiliation
  • Foxe D; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. david.foxe@sydney.edu.au.
  • Irish M; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. david.foxe@sydney.edu.au.
  • Carrick J; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Cheung SC; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
  • Teng H; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Burrell JR; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
  • Kessels RPC; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Piguet O; Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
J Neurol ; 2024 May 07.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713393
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study investigated the visuospatial working memory profiles of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) using a novel computerised test of visuospatial working memory the Box Task.

METHODS:

Twenty-eight bvFTD and 28 AD patients, as well as 32 age-matched control participants were recruited. All participants completed the Box Task and conventional neuropsychological tests of working memory, episodic memory, and visuospatial function.

RESULTS:

Both the bvFTD and AD groups exhibited significantly more Box Task between-search errors than the control group across all set sizes. Notably, the AD group demonstrated a significantly higher error rate compared to the bvFTD group. Regression analysis revealed that whilst episodic memory impairment significantly predicted Box Task error performance in AD, this was not the case for bvFTD. Additionally, a noticeable trend was observed for attention in predicting Box Task errors in both bvFTD and AD groups. The Box Task demonstrated high utility in differentiating between bvFTD and AD, with a decision tree correctly classifying 82.1% of bvFTD patients and 75% of AD patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings reveal significant visuospatial working memory impairments in bvFTD, albeit of lesser severity compared to disease-matched AD patients. The Box Task, a novel measure of visuospatial working memory, proved effective in differentiating between bvFTD and AD, outperforming many traditional neuropsychological measures. Overall, our findings highlight the utility of assessing visuospatial memory when differentiating between bvFTD and AD in the clinical setting.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Neurol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Neurol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Australie