Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chang, Jasmine Hui Er; Xu, Hongyun; Zhao, Yun; Wee, Ian Jun Yan; Ang, Joella Xiaohong; Tan, Emile Kwong-Wei; Seow-En, Isaac.
Affiliation
  • Chang JHE; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.
  • Xu H; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.
  • Zhao Y; Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Wee IJY; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.
  • Ang JX; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.
  • Tan EK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.
  • Seow-En I; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore. isaac.seow.en@gmail.com.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 172, 2024 Jun 03.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829526
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an alternative to conventional transabdominal retrieval. We aimed to compare outcomes following transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) and transabdominal specimen extraction (TASE) in minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

METHODS:

An electronic database search of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL was performed from inception until March 2023. Comparative studies evaluating TVSE versus TASE in adult female patients were included. Studies involving transanal NOSE, endoluminal surgery, or TVSE with concomitant hysterectomy were excluded. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratio were estimated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes respectively. Primary outcomes were postoperative day 1 (POD1) pain and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were operative time, rescue analgesia, morbidity, and cosmesis. A review of sexual, oncological, and technical outcomes was performed.

RESULTS:

Thirteen studies (2 randomised trials, 11 retrospective cohort studies), involving 1094 patients (TASE 583, TVSE 511), were included in the analysis. Seven studies involved colorectal disease and six assessed gynaecological conditions. TVSE resulted in significantly decreased POD1 pain (WMD 1.08, 95% CI 0.49, 1.68) and shorter LOS (WMD 1.18 days, 95% CI 0.14, 2.22), compared to TASE. Operative time was similar between both groups, with fewer patients requiring postoperative rescue analgesia with TVSE. Overall morbidity rates, as well as both wound-related and non-wound related complication rates were better with TVSE, while anastomotic morbidity rates were comparable. Cosmetic scores were higher with TVSE. TVSE did not result in worse sexual or oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

TVSE may be feasible and beneficial compared to TASE when performed by proficient laparoscopic operators, using appropriate selection criteria. Continued evaluation with prospective studies is warranted.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Vagin / Interventions chirurgicales mini-invasives Limites: Female / Humans Langue: En Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Singapour

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Vagin / Interventions chirurgicales mini-invasives Limites: Female / Humans Langue: En Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Singapour