Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indications and outcomes of the MitraClip G4 device with controlled gripper actuation system.
Nishiura, Naoki; Kubo, Shunsuke; Fujita, Mikitaka; Mushiake, Kazunori; Ono, Sachiyo; Osakada, Kohei; Maruo, Takeshi; Kadota, Kazushige.
Affiliation
  • Nishiura N; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
  • Kubo S; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan. sk12750@kchnet.or.jp.
  • Fujita M; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
  • Mushiake K; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
  • Ono S; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
  • Osakada K; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
  • Maruo T; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
  • Kadota K; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833119
ABSTRACT
The MitraClip G4 device has controlled gripper actuation (CGA) system, which allows the anterior and posterior grippers operate separately in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). We investigated the indications and outcomes of the use of CGA system during TEER for significant mitral regurgitation (MR). We reviewed 158 patients undergoing TEER with MitraClip G4 from September 2020 to July 2023. The CGA indications were (1) for grasping and (2) for leaflet insertion confirmation. Leaflet grasping was completed with CGA in 18 patients (11 and 7 patients for grasping and leaflet insertion confirmation, respectively). Patients with flail leaflets or coaptation gap more frequently required CGA, indicating more complex mitral valve anatomy. The procedural success and adverse event rates (death, leaflet tear and single leaflet device attachment) were not different between the CGA and non-CGA groups. In patients requiring CGA, single leaflet device attachment was observed in 1 patient and leaflet tear in 1 patient during follow-up. In these two cases, CGA was required for grasping, and the clip was moved over a large distance (6.5 and 12.4 mm, respectively). In patients who had undergone CGA for confirmation, no device-related adverse event or MR recurrence was noted. In patients with complex mitral valve anatomy, CGA may be a safe and effective method for confirming leaflet insertion. It should be noted that when using CGA for leaflet grasping, especially when the clip is moved significantly, attention should be paid to leaflet adverse events.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Cardiovasc Interv Ther Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Japon

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Cardiovasc Interv Ther Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Japon