Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.
Musvipwa, Faith; Wonkam, Ambroise; Berkman, Benjamin; de Vries, Jantina.
Affiliation
  • Musvipwa F; Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. faith.musvipwa@uct.ac.za.
  • Wonkam A; Ethics Lab Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. faith.musvipwa@uct.ac.za.
  • Berkman B; Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • de Vries J; Johns Hopkins Department of Genetic Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
BMC Med Ethics ; 25(1): 67, 2024 Jun 07.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849807
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Genetic research can yield information that is unrelated to the study's objectives but may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. There is an emerging but controversial responsibility to return some genetic research results, however there is little evidence available about the views of genomic researchers and others on the African continent.

METHODS:

We conducted a continental survey to solicit perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.

RESULTS:

A total of 110 persons participated in the survey with 51 complete and 59 incomplete surveys received. Data was summarised using descriptive analysis. Overall, our respondents believed that individual genetic research results that are clinically actionable should be returned to study participants apparently because participants have a right to know things about their health, and it might also be a means for research participation to be recognized. Nonetheless, there is a need for development of precise guidance on how to return individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.

DISCUSSION:

Participants should receive information that could promote a healthier lifestyle; only clinically actionable findings should be returned, and participants should receive all important information that is directly relevant to their health. Nevertheless, detailed guidelines should inform what ought to be returned. H3Africa guidelines stipulate that it is generally considered good practice for researchers to feedback general study results, but there is no consensus about whether individual genomic study results should also be fed back. The decision on what individual results to feedback, if any, is very challenging and the specific context is important to make an appropriate determination.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Personnel de recherche / Génomique / Comités d'éthique de la recherche / Recherche génétique Limites: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Pays/Région comme sujet: Africa Langue: En Journal: BMC Med Ethics / BMC med. ethics (Online) / BMC medical ethics (Online) Sujet du journal: ETICA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: République d'Afrique du Sud Pays de publication: Royaume-Uni

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Personnel de recherche / Génomique / Comités d'éthique de la recherche / Recherche génétique Limites: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Pays/Région comme sujet: Africa Langue: En Journal: BMC Med Ethics / BMC med. ethics (Online) / BMC medical ethics (Online) Sujet du journal: ETICA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: République d'Afrique du Sud Pays de publication: Royaume-Uni