Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ceramic Implant Rehabilitation: Consensus Statements from Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology: Consensus Statements on Ceramic Implant.
Schnurr, Etyene; Sperlich, Mathias; Sones, Amerian; Romanos, George E; Rutkowski, J L; Duddeck, Dirk U; Neugebauer, Jörg; Att, Wael; Sperlich, Markus; Volz, Karl Ulrich; Ghanaati, Shahram.
Affiliation
  • Schnurr E; Ceramic and Biological Dentistry Foundation, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.
  • Sperlich M; Basic Science Department, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.
  • Sones A; Private Practice, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Romanos GE; Board of Directors of the Academy of Osseointegration.
  • Rutkowski JL; Department of Periodontology and Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Duddeck DU; Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
  • Neugebauer J; CleanImplant Foundation, Berlin, Germany.
  • Att W; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.
  • Sperlich M; Department of Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Volz KU; Private Practice, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Ghanaati S; Swiss Biohealth Clinic, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.
J Oral Implantol ; 50(4): 435-445, 2024 Aug 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867376
ABSTRACT
The objectives of the study group focused on the following main topics related to the performance of 1- and 2-piece ceramic implants defining bone-implant-contact percentages and its measurement methods, evaluating the pink esthetic score as an esthetic outcome parameter after immediate implantation, recognizing the different results of ceramic implant designs as redefined by the German Association of Oral Implantology, incorporating the patient report outcome measure to include satisfaction and improvement in oral health-related quality of life, and conducting preclinical studies to address existing gaps in ceramic implants. During the Joint Congress for Ceramic Implantology (2022), the study group evaluated 17 clinical trials published between 2015 and 2021. After extensive discussions and multiple closed sessions, consensus statements and recommendations were developed, incorporating all approved modifications. A 1-piece implant design features a coronal part that is fused to the implant body or interfaces with the postabutment restoration platform, undergoing transmucosal healing. Long-term evaluations of this implant design are supported by established favorable clinical evidence. Inaccuracies in the pink esthetic score and bone-implant-contact percentages were managed by establishing control groups for preclinical studies and randomizing clinical trials. The patient-reported outcome measures were adjusted to include an individual visual analog scale, collected from each clinical study, that quantified improved oral health and quality of life. Preclinical investigations should focus on examining the spread of ceramic debris and the impact of heat generation on tissue and cellular levels during drilling. Further technical advancements should prioritize wound management and developing safe drilling protocols.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Céramiques / Dentisterie esthétique Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Oral Implantol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Suisse Pays de publication: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Céramiques / Dentisterie esthétique Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Oral Implantol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Suisse Pays de publication: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA