Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of video-assisted preanesthetic patient education on preanesthetic interview time; A prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Park, Heechan; Ko, Eunji; Lim, Choon Hak; Lee, Jeonghoon; Kim, Dongil; Yeom, Gyeongmin; Lee, Kyungmin.
Affiliation
  • Park H; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Ko E; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lim CH; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim D; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Yeom G; H-Plus Yangji Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee K; Korea Univiersity Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(25): e38577, 2024 Jun 21.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905399
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A preanesthetic evaluation interview with an anesthesiologist is essential for patient safety, however, it is not performed adequately owing to the excessive workload of doctors. This study aimed to determine whether video-assisted preanesthetic patient education can reduce patient interview time and solve the problem of excessive labor at a relatively low cost.

METHODS:

This study considered relatively healthy patients aged 19 to 65 years who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. None of the patients had history of general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned 11 to Groups V and C. Group V watched the preanesthetic education video, while Group C did not. The duration of the preanesthetic evaluation interview was measured for all participants. The satisfaction of the anesthesiologist and patient with the preanesthetic evaluation procedure, anxiety of the patient, and vital signs during surgery were collected.

RESULTS:

A total of 33 patients in Group V watched the preanesthetic education video, while 31 patients in Group C did not. Group V spent significantly less time on the preanesthetic evaluation interview with an anesthesiologist than that of Group C (172.42 vs 196.68 seconds; P = .005). There was no difference in patient and anesthesiologist satisfaction between the 2 groups (P = .861 and P = .849, respectively). Patients' anxiety (P = .474), intraoperative mean blood pressure (P = .168), and heart rate (P = .934) did not differ between Groups V and C.

CONCLUSION:

Watching the informational video about anesthesia before preanesthetic evaluation could reduce the interview time by an average of 24 seconds, with no difference in patients' or doctors' satisfaction or anxiety compared to patients who did not watch it. Video-assisted preanesthetic patient education indicates that the load on anesthesiologists can be reduced.
Sujet(s)

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Éducation du patient comme sujet / Satisfaction des patients / Anesthésie générale Limites: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Corée du Sud Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Éducation du patient comme sujet / Satisfaction des patients / Anesthésie générale Limites: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Corée du Sud Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique