Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perspectives of patients, dental professionals, and stakeholders on the use of silver diamine fluoride for the management of dental caries: A qualitative systematic review.
Soares, Gustavo Hermes; Poirier, Brianna; Cachagee, Madison; Turton, Bathsheba; Werneck, Renata; Jamieson, Lisa.
Affiliation
  • Soares GH; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Electronic address: gustavo.soares@adelaide.edu.au.
  • Poirier B; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Cachagee M; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Turton B; Office of Global and Population Health, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Werneck R; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Curitiba, Brazil.
  • Jamieson L; Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Dent ; 147: 105145, 2024 Aug.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906452
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation aimed to synthesise evidence regarding perceptions of patients, practitioners, and stakeholders on the use of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) for the management of dental caries. DATA This review was reported in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023390301) and the Joanna Briggs Systematic Reviews register. SOURCES References were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE using a pre-established search strategy. STUDY SELECTION Qualitative and mixed-methods studies examining perspectives of patients, practitioners, and/or stakeholders on the use of SDF were included. The initial search identified 650 articles eligible for inclusion, out of which 14 articles were included in the review. Reviewers synthesised findings and generated 11 distinct categories grouped into three synthesised

findings:

1) Clinical use; 2) Staining; 3) Facilitators and barriers.

CONCLUSIONS:

Practitioners and patients viewed SDF as a therapeutic option with multiple benefits. While aesthetic concerns may be a barrier to some groups, the acceptance of the treatment was influenced by other factors, such as trusting professional advice. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

Patient education is key for increased SDF acceptance. This systematic review can assist clinicians in addressing concerns regarding SDF therapy. Findings have the potential to inform policy decisions that address oral health inequities through patient-centred health care models.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Cariostatiques / Fluorures topiques / Composés de l'argent / Caries dentaires / Composés d'ammonium quaternaire Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Dent Année: 2024 Type de document: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Cariostatiques / Fluorures topiques / Composés de l'argent / Caries dentaires / Composés d'ammonium quaternaire Limites: Humans Langue: En Journal: J Dent Année: 2024 Type de document: Article