Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential interactions between medications for rate control and direct oral anticoagulants: Population-based cohort and case-crossover study.
Wong, Angel Y S; Warren-Gash, Charlotte; Bhaskaran, Krishnan; Leyrat, Clémence; Banerjee, Amitava; Smeeth, Liam; Douglas, Ian J.
Affiliation
  • Wong AYS; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Angel.Wong@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Warren-Gash C; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bhaskaran K; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Leyrat C; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Banerjee A; Institute of Health Informatics, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London UCL, London, United Kingdom.
  • Smeeth L; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Douglas IJ; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm ; 2024 Jun 21.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909715
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly co-prescribed with amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil, but whether there is a drug interaction between these drugs is unclear.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of clinical outcomes associated with concomitant use of DOACs and amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil.

METHODS:

We identified DOAC users in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. We used a cohort design to estimate hazard ratios for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, other bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality, comparing DOACs + amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil users and DOACs + beta-blocker users. A case-crossover design comparing odds of exposure to different drug initiation patterns for all outcomes in hazard window vs referent window within an individual also was conducted.

RESULTS:

Of 397,459 DOAC users, we included 9075 co-prescribed amiodarone, 9612 co-prescribed diltiazem, and 2907 co-prescribed verapamil. There was no difference in risk of any outcomes between DOACs + amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil users vs DOACs + beta-blocker users in the cohort design. However, in the case-crossover design, we observed an odds ratio (OR) of 2.09 (99% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.18) for all-cause mortality associated with initiation of a DOAC while taking amiodarone, which was greater than that observed for DOAC monotherapy (OR 1.30; 99% CI 1.25-1.35). Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality respectively with diltiazem.

CONCLUSION:

Our study showed no evidence of higher bleeding or cardiovascular risk associated with co-prescribed DOACs and amiodarone, diltiazem, or verapamil. Elevated risks of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were only observed during DOAC initiation when diltiazem/amiodarone were being taken.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Heart Rhythm / Heart rhythm Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Heart Rhythm / Heart rhythm Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique