Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of First-trimester Screening and Prevention of Preeclampsia: a Stepped Wedge Cluster-randomized Trial in Asia.
Nguyen-Hoang, Long; Dinh, Linh Thuy; Tai, Angela S T; Nguyen, Duy-Anh; Pooh, Ritsuko K; Shiozaki, Arihiro; Zheng, Mingming; Hu, Yali; Li, Bin; Kusuma, Raden Aditya; Yapan, Piengbulan; Gosavi, Arundhati; Kaneko, Mayumi; Luewan, Suchaya; Chang, Tung-Yao; Chaiyasit, Noppadol; Nanthakomon, Tongta; Liu, Huishu; Shaw, Steven W; Leung, Wing Cheong; Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah; Aguilar, Angela; Leung, Hillary H Y; Lee, Nikki M W; Lau, So Ling; Wah, Isabella Y M; Lu, Xiaohong; Sahota, Daljit S; Chong, Marc K C; Poon, Liona C.
Affiliation
  • Nguyen-Hoang L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Dinh LT; Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam, VIET NAM.
  • Tai AST; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, HONG KONG.
  • Nguyen DA; Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam, VIET NAM.
  • Pooh RK; CRIFM Prenatal Medical Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
  • Shiozaki A; Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
  • Zheng M; Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
  • Hu Y; Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
  • Li B; Kunming Angel Women and Children's Hospital, the Teaching Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
  • Kusuma RA; Harapan Kita Women and Children Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Yapan P; Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Gosavi A; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Kaneko M; Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Luewan S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  • Chang TY; Department of Fetal Medicine, Taiji Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chaiyasit N; King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Nanthakomon T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
  • Liu H; Department of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Shaw SW; Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, TAIWAN.
  • Leung WC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Mahdy ZA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Malaysia.
  • Aguilar A; University of the Philippines College of Medicine, The Philippine General Hospital, Manila, the Philippines.
  • Leung HHY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Lee NMW; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Lau SL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Wah IYM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Lu X; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, HONG KONG.
  • Sahota DS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Chong MKC; The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Poon LC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Circulation ; 2024 Jun 26.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923439
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia (PE) in Asia.

METHODS:

Between 1st August 2019 and 28th February 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from ten regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular six-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from non-intervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm PE using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm PE ≥ 1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks.

RESULTS:

Overall, 88.04% (42,897/48,725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm PE. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2,919/3,543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm PE between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 2.77). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm PE (aOR 0.59; 95%CI 0.37 to 0.92). Additionally, it correlated with 54%, 55% and 64% reduction in the incidence of PE with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.46; 95%CI 0.23 to 0.93), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR 0.45; 95%CI 0.22 to 0.92) and perinatal death (aOR 0.34; 95%CI 0.12 to 0.91), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm PE is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm PE. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm PE by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm PE is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm PE on a global scale.

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Circulation Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Circulation Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine
...