Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A navigated, robot-driven laser craniotomy tool for frameless depth electrode implantation. An in-vivo recovery animal study.
Winter, Fabian; Pilz, Patrick; Kramer, Anne M; Beer, Daniel; Gono, Patrick; Morawska, Marta; Hainfellner, Johannes; Klotz, Sigrid; Tomschik, Matthias; Pataraia, Ekaterina; Hangel, Gilbert; Dorfer, Christian; Roessler, Karl.
Affiliation
  • Winter F; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Pilz P; Department of Medical Science Division, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kramer AM; Department of Medical Science Division, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Beer D; Advanced Osteotomy Tools, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Gono P; Advanced Osteotomy Tools, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Morawska M; Advanced Osteotomy Tools, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Hainfellner J; Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Klotz S; Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Tomschik M; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Pataraia E; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Hangel G; Department of Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Dorfer C; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Roessler K; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Robot AI ; 11: 1355409, 2024.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933084
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

We recently introduced a frameless, navigated, robot-driven laser tool for depth electrode implantation as an alternative to frame-based procedures. This method has only been used in cadaver and non-recovery studies. This is the first study to test the robot-driven laser tool in an in vivo recovery animal study.

Methods:

A preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan was conducted to plan trajectories in sheep specimens. Burr hole craniotomies were performed using a frameless, navigated, robot-driven laser tool. Depth electrodes were implanted after cut-through detection was confirmed. The electrodes were cut at the skin level postoperatively. Postoperative imaging was performed to verify accuracy. Histopathological analysis was performed on the bone, dura, and cortex samples.

Results:

Fourteen depth electrodes were implanted in two sheep specimens. Anesthetic protocols did not show any intraoperative irregularities. One sheep was euthanized on the same day of the procedure while the other sheep remained alive for 1 week without neurological deficits. Postoperative MRI and CT showed no intracerebral bleeding, infarction, or unintended damage. The average bone thickness was 6.2 mm (range 4.1-8.0 mm). The angulation of the planned trajectories varied from 65.5° to 87.4°. The deviation of the entry point performed by the frameless laser beam ranged from 0.27 mm to 2.24 mm. The histopathological analysis did not reveal any damage associated with the laser beam.

Conclusion:

The novel robot-driven laser craniotomy tool showed promising results in this first in vivo recovery study. These findings indicate that laser craniotomies can be performed safely and that cut-through detection is reliable.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Robot AI Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Autriche Pays de publication: Suisse

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Robot AI Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Autriche Pays de publication: Suisse