Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for mild-moderate acute respiratory failure in patients with blunt chest trauma: An exploratory descriptive study.
Zhu, Qingcheng; Tan, Dingyu; Wang, Huihui; Zhao, Runmin; Ling, Bingyu.
Affiliation
  • Zhu Q; Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
  • Tan D; Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
  • Wang H; Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
  • Zhao R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
  • Ling B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China. Electronic address: hopeman1989@163.com.
Am J Emerg Med ; 83: 76-81, 2024 Sep.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981159
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is gaining popularity for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of HFNC for hypoxemic ARF in patients with blunt chest trauma (BCT).

METHODS:

This retrospective analysis focused on BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF who were treated with either HFNC or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the emergency medicine department from January 2021 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as either invasive ventilation, or a switch to the other study treatment (NIV for patients in the NFNC group, and vice-versa).

RESULTS:

A total of 157 patients with BCT (72 in the HFNC group and 85 in the NIV group) were included in this study. The treatment failure rate in the HFNC group was 11.1% and 16.5% in the NIV group - risk difference of 5.36% (95% CI, -5.94-16.10%; P = 0.366). The most common cause of failure in the HFNC group was aggravation of respiratory distress. While in the NIV group, the most common reason for failure was treatment intolerance. Treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group (1.4% vs 9.4%, 95% CI 0.40-16.18; P = 0.039). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that chronic respiratory disease, abbreviated injury scale score (chest) (≥3), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (≥15), partial arterial oxygen tension /fraction of inspired oxygen (≤200) at 1 h of treatment and respiratory rate (≥32 /min) at 1 h of treatment were risk factors associated with HFNC failure.

CONCLUSION:

In BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF, the usage of HFNC did not lead to higher rate of treatment failure when compared to NIV. HFNC was found to offer better comfort and tolerance than NIV, suggesting it may be a promising new respiratory support therapy for BCT patients with mild-moderate ARF.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Oxygénothérapie / Insuffisance respiratoire / Blessures du thorax / Plaies non pénétrantes / Ventilation non effractive / Canule Limites: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Oxygénothérapie / Insuffisance respiratoire / Blessures du thorax / Plaies non pénétrantes / Ventilation non effractive / Canule Limites: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine