Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding women's and men's perspectives on cervical cancer screening in Uganda: a qualitative study.
Bouskill, Kathryn; Wagner, Glenn J; Gizaw, Mahlet; Matovu, Joseph Kb; Juncker, Margrethe; Namisango, Eve; Nakami, Sylvia; Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly; Luyirika, Emmanuel; Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
Affiliation
  • Bouskill K; RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90411, USA. gwagner@rand.org.
  • Wagner GJ; RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90411, USA.
  • Gizaw M; RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90411, USA.
  • Matovu JK; School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Juncker M; Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
  • Namisango E; Rays of Hope Hospice Jinja, Jinja, Uganda.
  • Nakami S; African Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Beyeza-Kashesya J; Rays of Hope Hospice Jinja, Jinja, Uganda.
  • Luyirika E; Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Wanyenze RK; School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 933, 2024 Aug 01.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090654
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cervical cancer remains a significant but preventable threat to women's health throughout much of the developing world, including Uganda. Cervical cancer screening and timely treatment of pre-cancerous lesions is a cost-effective means of mitigating cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. However, only 5% of women in Uganda have ever been screened. Barriers to screening, such as social stigma and access to safe conditions, have been previously identified, but insights into the role of male spouses in encouraging or discouraging screening have been limited. To our knowledge, no studies have compared barriers and facilitators among women who had or had not yet been screened and male partners of screened and unscreened women.

METHODS:

To resolve this gap, we conducted 7 focus groups- 3 among women who had been screened, 3 among those who had not been screened, and 1 among men whose female partners had or had not been screened. We performed qualitative thematic analysis on the focus group data.

RESULTS:

We identified several important factors impacting screening and the decision to screen among women, ranging from stigma, availability of screening, false beliefs around the procedure and side effects, and the role of spousal support in screening promotion. Male spousal perspectives for screening ranged from full support to hesitancy around male-performed exams and possible prolonged periods without intercourse.

CONCLUSION:

This exploratory work demonstrates the importance of dialogue both among women and their male partners in enhancing screening uptake. Efforts to address screening uptake are necessary given that it is an important means of mitigating the burden of cervical cancer. Interventions along these lines need to take these barriers and facilitators into account in order to drive up demand for screening.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs du col de l'utérus / Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé / Groupes de discussion / Recherche qualitative / Dépistage précoce du cancer Limites: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Pays/Région comme sujet: Africa Langue: En Journal: BMC Cancer Sujet du journal: NEOPLASIAS Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Tumeurs du col de l'utérus / Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé / Groupes de discussion / Recherche qualitative / Dépistage précoce du cancer Limites: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Pays/Région comme sujet: Africa Langue: En Journal: BMC Cancer Sujet du journal: NEOPLASIAS Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique