Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of twice-daily budesonide foam administration on early clinical response and endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a post hoc analysis.
Watanabe, Kenji; Hirai, Fumihito; Kobayashi, Kiyonori; Takeuchi, Ken; Kurosu, Shinsuke; Inagaki, Katsutoshi; Iwayama, Ken-Ichi; Naganuma, Makoto.
Affiliation
  • Watanabe K; Department of Internal Medicine for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
  • Hirai F; Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Kobayashi K; Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
  • Takeuchi K; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IBD Center, Tsujinaka Hospital Kashiwanoha, Chiba, Japan.
  • Kurosu S; EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Inagaki K; EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Iwayama KI; Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Naganuma M; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098867
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Early treatment response of ulcerative colitis (UC) symptom resolution is desirable. This post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy outcomes, including endoscopic remission, by responder status and the influence of once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) budesonide foam dosing in patients with UC.

METHODS:

Data were pooled from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials of budesonide rectal foam QD or BID or placebo for up to 12 weeks. Outcomes were evaluated by treatment and budesonide administration regimen and by responder group early (rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] 0 from Week 2 through Week 6), delayed (RBS 0 at Week 6), and nonresponder (RBS > 0 at Week 6).

RESULTS:

The main analysis set included 55 (QD) and 120 (BID) budesonide-treated patients and 116 placebo-treated patients. At Week 6, the trend in early response rate was significant among treatment groups (BID, 45.3%; QD, 32.1%; placebo, 12.8%; P < 0.0001). Among BID recipients, trends for complete endoscopic remission rate (Mayo endoscopic score [MES] = 0) and endoscopic remission rate (MES = 0 or 1) were significant among responder status groups (early responder, 67.4% and 95.4%, respectively; delayed responder, 48.1% and 85.2%; nonresponder, 24.0% and 64.0%; P < 0.001 for both). Regardless of the administration regimen, most early responders achieved endoscopic remission at Week 6. Among responder status groups, early responders' cumulative non-relapse period was greatest (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION:

A BID budesonide administration regimen is preferred to increase the probability of early response and, following endoscopic remission, a better prognosis after stopping treatment.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Sujet du journal: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Japon Pays de publication: Australie

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Sujet du journal: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Japon Pays de publication: Australie