Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cytomegalovirus immunity in high-risk liver transplant recipients following preemptive antiviral therapy vs. prophylaxis.
Zamora, Danniel; Dasgupta, Sayan; Stevens-Ayers, Terry; Edmison, Bradley; Winston, Drew J; Razonable, Raymund R; Mehta, Aneesh K; Lyon, G Marshall; Boeckh, Michael; Singh, Nina; Koelle, David M; Limaye, Ajit P.
Affiliation
  • Zamora D; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Dasgupta S; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Stevens-Ayers T; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Edmison B; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Winston DJ; Division of Infectious Diseases, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States of America.
  • Razonable RR; Department of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States of America.
  • Mehta AK; Department of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States of America.
  • Lyon GM; Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States of America.
  • Boeckh M; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Singh N; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States of America.
  • Koelle DM; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Limaye AP; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
JCI Insight ; 2024 Jul 23.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099206
ABSTRACT
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cells, NK cells, and neutralizing antibodies (nAb) were assessed in a randomized trial of CMV prevention with preemptive antiviral therapy (PET) vs. prophylactic antiviral therapy (PRO) in donor seropositive/recipient seronegative (D+R-) liver transplant recipients (LTxR), at 100 days (end of intervention), and at 6 and 12 months post-transplant. The PET group had significantly increased numbers of circulating polyfunctional T-cells, NK cells, and nAb compared to the PRO group at day 100 and several CMV immune parameters remained significantly higher by 12 months post-transplant. Among PET recipients, preceding CMV viremia (vs. no preceding viremia) was associated with significantly higher levels of most CMV immune parameters at day 100. Higher numbers of CMV-specific polyfunctional T-cells and NKG2C+ NK cells at day 100 were associated with a decreased incidence of CMV disease in multivariable Cox regression. The strongest associations with protection against CMV disease were with increased numbers of CMV-specific polyfunctional CD4 T-cells, CD3negCD56dimCD57negNKG2Cpos, and CD3negCD56dimCD57posNKG2Cpos NK cells. PET is superior to PRO for CMV disease prevention by allowing low-level CMV replication and associated antigen exposure that is promptly controlled by antiviral therapy and facilitates enhanced CMV protective immunity in D+R- LTxR.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: JCI Insight Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: JCI Insight Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: États-Unis d'Amérique