Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.
Barello, Serena; Anderson, Gloria; Bosio, Caterina; Lane, Deirdre A; Leo, Donato G; Lobban, Trudie C A; Trevisan, Caterina; Graffigna, Guendalina.
Affiliation
  • Barello S; EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  • Anderson G; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  • Bosio C; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Lane DA; EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  • Leo DG; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science and Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Lobban TCA; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Trevisan C; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science and Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Graffigna G; Arrhythmia Alliance, Stratford-upon-Avon, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol ; 15: 1345117, 2024.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100568
ABSTRACT

Background:

People with multimorbidity are increasingly engaged, enabled, and empowered to take responsibility for managing their health status. The purpose of the study was to systematically review and appraise the psychometric properties of tools measuring patient engagement in adults with multimorbidity and their applicability for use within engagement programs.

Methods:

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were searched from inception to 1 July 2021. Gray literature was searched using EBSCO host-database "Open dissertation". The reference lists of studies meeting the inclusion criteria were searched to identify additional eligible studies. The screening of the search results and the data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated with the COSMIN checklist. Relevant data from all included articles were extracted and summarized in evidence synthesis tables.

Results:

Twenty articles on eight tools were included. We included tools that measure all four dimensions of patient engagement (i.e., engagement, empowerment, activation, and participation). Their psychometric properties were analyzed separately. Most tools were developed in the last 10 years in Europe or the USA. The comparison of the estimated psychometric properties of the retrieved tools highlighted a significant lack of reliable patient engagement measures for people with multimorbidity. Available measures capture a diversity of constructs and have very limited evidence of psychometric properties that are vital for patient-reported measures, such as invariance, reliability, and responsiveness.

Conclusion:

This review clarifies how patient engagement, as operationalized in measures purporting to capture this concept, overlaps with, and differs from other related constructs in adults with multimorbidity. The methodological quality of psychometric tools measuring patient engagement in adults with multimorbidity could be improved. Systematic review registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=259968, identifier CRD42021259968.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Psychol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Italie

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Front Psychol Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Italie