Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors associated with correction of personal protective equipment nonadherence in a multidisciplinary emergency department setting: A retrospective video review.
Kim, Mary S; Sarcevic, Aleksandra; Sippel, Genevieve J; McCarthy, Kathleen H; Wood, Eleanor A; Riley, Carmen; Mun, Aaron H; O'Connell, Karen J; LaPuma, Peter T; Burd, Randall S.
Affiliation
  • Kim MS; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
  • Sarcevic A; College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Sippel GJ; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
  • McCarthy KH; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
  • Wood EA; College of Medicine, Drexel University Health Sciences Building, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Riley C; College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Mun AH; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
  • O'Connell KJ; Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
  • LaPuma PT; Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, Milken School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
  • Burd RS; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC. Electronic address: rburd@childrensnational.org.
Am J Infect Control ; 2024 Aug 06.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116999
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite local and national recommendations, health care provider adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) varied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies have identified factors influencing initial PPE adherence but did not address factors influencing behaviors leading to correction after initial nonadherence.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective video review of 18 pediatric resuscitations involving aerosol-generating procedures from March 2020 to December 2022 to identify factors associated with nonadherence correction. We quantified adherent and nonadherent providers, instances of PPE nonadherence, and time to correction. We also analyzed correction behaviors, including provider actions and correction locations.

RESULTS:

Among 434 providers, 362 (83%) were nonadherent with at least 1 PPE. Only 186 of 1,832 instances of nonadherence were corrected, primarily upon room entry and during patient care. Correction time varied by PPE type and nonadherence level (incomplete vs absent). Most corrections were self-initiated, with few reminders from other providers.

DISCUSSION:

Potential barriers to correction include a lack of social pressure and external reminders. Solutions include optimizing PPE availability, providing real-time feedback, and educating on double gloving.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most providers were nonadherent to PPE requirements during high-risk infection transmission events. The low correction rate suggests challenges in promoting collective responsibility and maintaining protective behaviors during medical emergencies.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays de publication: États-Unis d'Amérique